On 25/07/2009, Felix Zielcke fziel...@z-51.de wrote:
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 18:04 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
So if there still won't come up objections against this, then I'll do
the change, then at least an
Am Sonntag, den 26.07.2009, 10:38 +0200 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
On 25/07/2009, Felix Zielcke fziel...@z-51.de wrote:
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 18:04 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
So if there still won't come up
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 23:17 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 23:31 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Felix Zielckefziel...@z-51.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.02.2009, 08:24 -0800 schrieb Colin D Bennett:
On Mon,
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 18:04 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
So if there still won't come up objections against this, then I'll do
the change, then at least an Ubuntu bug report can be closed.
I think it's fine, but is
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 23:31 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Felix Zielckefziel...@z-51.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.02.2009, 08:24 -0800 schrieb Colin D Bennett:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:11:16 +0100
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.02.2009, 08:24 -0800 schrieb Colin D Bennett:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:11:16 +0100
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:49:53PM -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
This patch greatly—*tremendously*, even, if higher-numbered Unicode
characters are
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Felix Zielckefziel...@z-51.de wrote:
Am Montag, den 09.02.2009, 08:24 -0800 schrieb Colin D Bennett:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:11:16 +0100
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:49:53PM -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
This patch
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:39:53AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
Any reason not to merge this patch?
Probably not. Btw does Colin need/have an account?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's
Am Montag, den 13.04.2009, 15:57 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:39:53AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
Any reason not to merge this patch?
Probably not. Btw does Colin need/have an account?
Colin has an account and already commit access.
--
Felix Zielcke
Any reason not to merge this patch?
Colin D Bennett wrote:
This patch greatly—*tremendously*, even, if higher-numbered Unicode
characters are used—speeds up retrieving a glyph for a particular
Unicode character. This makes text rendering in general much faster.
My text benchmark shows the new
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:49:53PM -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
This patch greatly—*tremendously*, even, if higher-numbered Unicode
characters are used—speeds up retrieving a glyph for a particular
Unicode character. This makes text rendering in general much faster.
My text benchmark shows
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:11:16 +0100
Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:49:53PM -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
This patch greatly—*tremendously*, even, if higher-numbered Unicode
characters are used—speeds up retrieving a glyph for a particular
Unicode character.
This patch greatly—*tremendously*, even, if higher-numbered Unicode
characters are used—speeds up retrieving a glyph for a particular
Unicode character. This makes text rendering in general much faster.
My text benchmark shows the new text rendering speed is somewhere from
2.6x to 31x of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
