Committed.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 04:10:35PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps i can check in the part that sets boot device for multiboot
> loader first.
I think we all agree that this part is desirable :-)
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you a
Hi,
Perhaps i can check in the part that sets boot device for multiboot
loader first.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On Thursday 28 February 2008 17:58, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:14:06AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > There are worse situations in fact (in that they're more common), like
> > > RAID and LVM drives (which can be the boot device too).
> > >
> > > But I don't think we need parser
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:14:06AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > There are worse situations in fact (in that they're more common), like RAID
> > and LVM drives (which can be the boot device too).
> >
> > But I don't think we need parser code for that. The path part of the
> > prefix
> > (/boot/g
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ readding CC to grub-devel ]
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:26:12PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:10:46AM -0500
[ readding CC to grub-devel ]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:26:12PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:10:46AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > > Quoting Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > >This patch allo
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:10:46AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >This patch allow passing command line options to core.img or g2ldr:
>
> Isn't it an overkill? When do you think it would be really needed in
> practice? I don't feel good about adding code j
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:50 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Quoting Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > This patch allow passing command line op
Quoting Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This patch allow passing command line options to core.img or g2ldr:
Isn't it an overkill? When do you think it would be really needed in
practice? I don't feel good about adding code just because we can.
This patch also set the boot device in the multib
Hi,
This patch allow passing command line options to core.img or g2ldr:
For example, in grub2:
multiboot /core.img prefix=(hd0,1)/boot/grub
multiboot /core.img root=(hd0,1)
linux /g2ldr prefix=(hd0,1)/boot/grub
linux /g2ldr root=(hd0,1)
prefix will take preference over root.
you can also set o
11 matches
Mail list logo
