On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:47:48PM +0200, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
Why so small heap?
I copied ieee1275 HEAP_MIN_SIZE to begin with, and it was always enough.
(Since U-Boot doesn't provide any memory mapping service, kernel and
initrd are not going on the heap.)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:15:20AM +0200, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
=== added directory 'grub-core/kern/arm/uboot'
=== added file 'grub-core/kern/arm/uboot/startup.S'
--- grub-core/kern/arm/uboot/startup.S 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++
On 09.04.2013 13:39, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:15:20AM +0200, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
=== added directory 'grub-core/kern/arm/uboot'
=== added file 'grub-core/kern/arm/uboot/startup.S'
--- grub-core/kern/arm/uboot/startup.S 1970-01-01
Here is what I have in my local tree (full patch). Contains also an
initial attempt at i386-uboot but given sorry state of uboot on i386,
I'll probably abandon it instead of finishing
=== modified file 'Makefile.util.def'
--- Makefile.util.def 2013-04-07 00:41:07 +
+++ Makefile.util.def
Trouble is that grub-install now rightfully warns about the lack of
platform-specific install.
What do we have to do to register the image at u-boot?
Put it in specific location?
EFI provides three very nice things:
- Standardised partition and filesystem type for bootloaders.
-
On 03.04.2013 18:32, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:15:03AM +0200, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_STACK_SIZE 0x4
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_HEAP_SIZE (grub_size_t) (2 * 1024 * 1024)
Why so small heap?
I copied ieee1275
On 24.03.2013 18:01, Leif Lindholm wrote:
0004-arm-uboot-support.patch
=== modified file 'Makefile.util.def'
--- Makefile.util.def 2013-03-24 13:03:12 +
+++ Makefile.util.def 2013-03-24 13:03:31 +
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@
enable = mips_loongson;
enable = ia64_efi;
enable
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:29:02PM +0200, Francesco Lavra wrote:
On 04/01/2013 04:15 AM, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Which architecture is raspberry pie? I have one here and it would be
good if I could use it for testing.
It's ARMv6, so unfortunately it's not supported by
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:15:03AM +0200, Vladimir '??-coder/phcoder'
Serbinenko wrote:
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_STACK_SIZE 0x4
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_HEAP_SIZE (grub_size_t) (2 * 1024 * 1024)
Why so small heap?
I copied ieee1275 HEAP_MIN_SIZE to begin with, and it was
On 04/01/2013 04:15 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Which architecture is raspberry pie? I have one here and it would be
good if I could use it for testing.
It's ARMv6, so unfortunately it's not supported by this port, which
works only on ARMv7.
+#define
On 01.04.2013 11:53, Francesco Lavra wrote:
On 04/01/2013 04:15 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
Which architecture is raspberry pie? I have one here and it would be
good if I could use it for testing.
It's ARMv6, so unfortunately it's not supported by this port, which
Which architecture is raspberry pie? I have one here and it would be
good if I could use it for testing.
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_STACK_SIZE 0x4
+#define GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_HEAP_SIZE (grub_size_t) (2 * 1024 * 1024)
Why so small heap?
=== modified file 'util/grub-install.in'
---
0004-arm-uboot-support.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo