On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:40:45 +0200
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:06:17PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:20:46 +0200
> > Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:33:25PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > > When a subshell's output is
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:06:17PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:20:46 +0200
> Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:33:25PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > When a subshell's output is used as input to a "simple command", its
> > > return
I think you
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:20:46 +0200
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:33:25PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > When a subshell's output is used as input to a "simple command", its return
> > code is not checked. These subshells contain an execution of the grub-shell
> > script
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:33:25PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> When a subshell's output is used as input to a "simple command", its return
> code is not checked. These subshells contain an execution of the grub-shell
> script which does the work of the actual test. If grub-shell returns an
>
When a subshell's output is used as input to a "simple command", its return
code is not checked. These subshells contain an execution of the grub-shell
script which does the work of the actual test. If grub-shell returns an
error code, the test should fail. So refactor to not have the subshell