K

2017-06-15 Thread Treutwein Bernhard
Vj -- Bernhard Treutwein (mobil) LMU, Ref.VI.3 ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Add (multiple) -k, --pubkey=FILE support to grub-install command

2013-09-19 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Please update other install methods as well On 07.09.2013 01:59, Jon McCune wrote: > +pubkey_file_arg="" > +if [ x"$pubkey_file_list" != x ]; then > +for file in $pubkey_file_list; do > + if [ ! -e "$file" ]; then > +gettext_printf "Public key file %s not found.\n" "${file}" 1>&2 >

[PATCH v3 3/3] Add (multiple) -k, --pubkey=FILE support to grub-install command

2013-09-06 Thread Jon McCune
"${source_directory}" -O "${mkimage_target}" --output="${grubdir}/${grub_modinfo_target_cpu}-$grub_modinfo_platform/grub.efi" --prefix="" $grub_decompression_module $modules || exit 1 fi fi diff --git a/util/grub-install_header b/util/grub-install_h

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Add -k, --pubkey=FILE support to grub-install command

2013-09-06 Thread Jonathan McCune
ile_arg="" > > +if [ -e "$pubkey_file" ]; then > > +pubkey_file_arg="--pubkey=$pubkey_file" > > +fi > > + > > You should return an error if file does not exist, not silently ignore > it. Will fix. > > + --pubkey | -k)

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] Add -k, --pubkey=FILE support to grub-install command

2013-09-06 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
o_platform}" in > *) imgext=img ;; > esac > > +pubkey_file_arg="" > +if [ -e "$pubkey_file" ]; then > +pubkey_file_arg="--pubkey=$pubkey_file" > +fi > + You should return an error if file does not exist, not silently ignore it. > +

[PATCH v2 4/5] Add -k, --pubkey=FILE support to grub-install command

2013-09-06 Thread Jon McCune
s || exit 1 + "$grub_mkimage" -c "${config_opt_file}" "$pubkey_file_arg" -d "${source_directory}" -O "${mkimage_target}" --output="${grubdir}/${grub_modinfo_target_cpu}-$grub_modinfo_platform/grub.efi" --prefix="" $grub_decompr

RE: 226 F May 26 Yoshinori K. Okuji ( 25) [ configure host and target

2006-05-27 Thread Harley D. Eades III
> According to a suggestion by an autoconf developer, I think we should change > the build system in this way: > > - Use "host" to represent an environment in which utilities (tools) run. This > is a natural interpretation of the meaning of "host" in autoconf. > > - Use "target" to represent a

Re: 2Yoshinori K. Okuji

2005-09-21 Thread Ruslan Nikolaev
> I have no idea which patch is better, so please decide it with Marco. I also can't say what is better. However my patch already works perfectly on my x86_64 machine with Linux w/o 32-bit binaries support. All compiled utilities are 64-bit. Chainloading, multiboot and linux loading working. The pa