Glenn Washburn writes:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:58:40 +1100
> Daniel Axtens wrote:
>
>> > Reading more about patchwork, it seems to have its own set of
>> > issues, partly revolving around using a mailing list of development
>> > as we do. see: https://lwn.net/Articles/773456/
>>
>> I'm a
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:58:40 +1100
Daniel Axtens wrote:
> > Reading more about patchwork, it seems to have its own set of
> > issues, partly revolving around using a mailing list of development
> > as we do. see: https://lwn.net/Articles/773456/
>
> I'm a patchwork maintainer, happy to discuss
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 23:50 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
[...]
> It would probably make more sense to use a patchwork configured to
> run CI on incoming patches, and maybe even respond to the mailing
> list with status reports.
>
> e.g.
>
> https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/patches/20108
>
> Reading more about patchwork, it seems to have its own set of issues,
> partly revolving around using a mailing list of development as we do.
> see: https://lwn.net/Articles/773456/
I'm a patchwork maintainer, happy to discuss how Patchwork might be
helpful. It certainly isn't perfect (and
On 2/12/21 11:00 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> I poked around on a sourcehut account a little and its not obvious that
> can can integrate with an existing mailing list. It looks like it
> expects to host the mailinglist. I'm thinking there might be a way to
> configure it act like a peer
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:16:39 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > I believe I speak for more than just myself when I say that the
> > current development process leaves much to be desired. GRUB has
> > been in a feature freeze
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:35:05 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/12/21 4:58 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > And you're right the merge request part is not ideal. There
> > is redundancy, but I don't think its that big of a deal. There does
> > come more confusion when determining what patch series
On 2/12/21 4:58 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> There are two main parts to this work, the CI and the merge request
> automation. As I see it, your issue is not with the CI, but the merge
> requests.
Yes -- CI is indeed wonderful to have and should be implemented if
possible (which it always is,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Hi fellow GRUB developers,
>
> I want to start by recognizing that most people who are involved with
> the project maintenance are doing so on a voluntary basis (or at least
> that's my assumption) and people have busy lives. Its a
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 23:50:38 -0500
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 2/11/21 10:53 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > For patches that people don't want to disappear on the list, I
> > think a merge request can help mitigate that. Also since the merge
> > request is effectively a whole commit tree, instead of
On 2/11/21 10:53 PM, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> Hi fellow GRUB developers,
>
> I want to start by recognizing that most people who are involved with
> the project maintenance are doing so on a voluntary basis (or at least
> that's my assumption) and people have busy lives. Its a mostly
> thankless
Hi fellow GRUB developers,
I want to start by recognizing that most people who are involved with
the project maintenance are doing so on a voluntary basis (or at least
that's my assumption) and people have busy lives. Its a mostly
thankless job, so thank you guys for all the time spent keeping
12 matches
Mail list logo
