Hello!
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0100, I wrote:
I created the following patch to be able to continue building GRUB2 on
systems that have `-fstack-protector' enabled by default. (This patch is
equal to what we've been using in GNU Mach for some time now.)
2006-12-15 Thomas
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:40:54PM +0100, I wrote:
For some time, GCC now offers the following feature:
info Gcc
#v+
`-fstack-protector'
Emit extra code to check for buffer overflows, such as stack
smashing attacks. This is done by adding a guard variable to
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:36:20PM +0100, I wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:14:19PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a ?crit :
Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
and GRUB2 (and how to do that,
Hi,
Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 13 Nov 2006 19:29:53 +0100, a écrit :
+unsigned int __stack_chk_guard = 12345;
I'd say this should be something like a value with higher bits set, so
that it wouldn't be a valid pointer, even for reading.
Samuel
___
[Please keep both bug-hurd@gnu.org and grub-devel@gnu.org in the
recipients list.]
Hello!
For some time, GCC now offers the following feature:
info Gcc
#v+
`-fstack-protector'
Emit extra code to check for buffer overflows, such as stack
smashing attacks. This is done by adding a
Hello!
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:14:19PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a ?crit :
Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
and GRUB2 (and how to do that, then) or shall we unconditionally pass
Hi,
* Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061108 23:14]:
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
stack_chk_fail
Is it feasible to have the `-fstack-protector' functionality in GNU Mach
and GRUB2 (and how to
Hi,
Stefan Reinauer, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 23:36:44 +0100, a écrit :
* Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061108 23:14]:
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 08 Nov 2006 22:40:54 +0100, a écrit :
then cat gnumach-undef-bad; exit 2; else true; fi
stack_chk_fail
Is it feasible to have the
