Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > Отправлено с iPhone > >> 4 марта 2017 г., в 4:02, Robert LeBlanc написал(а): >> >> >> menuentry 'RXE Snapshot' { >> load_env -f /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grubenv >> configfile

Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

Отправлено с iPhone > 4 марта 2017 г., в 4:02, Robert LeBlanc написал(а): > > > menuentry 'RXE Snapshot' { > load_env -f /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grubenv > configfile /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grub.cfg > } > Grub.cfg as created by grub-mkconfig loads

Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> It loads the config for my RXE snapshot, but in doesn't select the >> default menuentry as specified in the snapshot's grubenv. This makes > > What is exact "default" value in loaded grubenv? Please see my reply to

Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Jordan Uggla wrote: > Grub's view of things at boot is necessarily different from the view > from your booted GNU/Linux environment, and indeed if you dual boot > two GNU/Linux OSs they will each mount each other's volumes to > different

Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

03.03.2017 00:40, Robert LeBlanc пишет: > I'm trying to add some menuentry items to move between btrfs > snapshots. I've added the following in the non-snapshot > /etc/grub.d/40_custom. > > menuentry 'RXE Snapshot' { >load_env -f /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grubenv >configfile

Re: Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

Grub's view of things at boot is necessarily different from the view from your booted GNU/Linux environment, and indeed if you dual boot two GNU/Linux OSs they will each mount each other's volumes to different areas. Presumably /snaps/ is a mountpoint where you have configured that your btrfs be

Menu for booting BTRFS snapshots

I'm trying to add some menuentry items to move between btrfs snapshots. I've added the following in the non-snapshot /etc/grub.d/40_custom. menuentry 'RXE Snapshot' { load_env -f /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grubenv configfile /snaps/rxe-boot/grub2/grub.cfg } It loads the config for my

Re: Booting from RAID (was: Re: booting btrfs)

В Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:03:52 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 13.01.2014 07:12, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: There are other problems with Fedora that prevent this from being

Re: booting btrfs

On 13.01.2014 06:05, Michael Chang wrote: --split --run=10_linux,20_linux_xen You shouldn't assume that only files you installed are the ones available. E.g. memtest adds its own config to /etc/grub.d. To disable os-prober use GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Booting from RAID (was: Re: booting btrfs)

On 13.01.2014 07:12, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: There are other problems with Fedora that prevent this from being usable now, including grubby which can't update grub.cfg during kernel updates, when /boot is on a

Re: booting btrfs

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:09:34AM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 13.01.2014 06:05, Michael Chang wrote: --split --run=10_linux,20_linux_xen You shouldn't assume that only files you installed are the ones available. E.g. memtest adds its own config to /etc/grub.d.

Re: booting btrfs

2014/1/13 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: 2014/1/11 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com: В Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:20:19 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: OK. To be more verbose, the question of mine is that I'm uncertain if we don't explicitly install to a partition using blocklists, the /fs/core.img would still automatically get blocklists of itself updated on it's own

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 05:08:49PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: OK. To be more verbose, the question of mine is that I'm uncertain if we don't explicitly install to a partition using blocklists, the /fs/core.img would

Re: booting btrfs

2014/1/11 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com: В Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:20:19 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a read only snapshot, then for no space cost also

Re: booting btrfs

2014/1/10 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: 2014/1/9 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Michael Chang

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: 2014/1/11 Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com: В Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:20:19 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could

Re: booting btrfs

On Jan 12, 2014, at 10:13 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: 2014/1/10 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: cat EOF /boot/efi/EFI/DISTRIBUTION/grub.cfg search --fs-uuid --set=root `grub-probe --target=fs_uuid

Booting from RAID (was: Re: booting btrfs)

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: There are other problems with Fedora that prevent this from being usable now, including grubby which can't update grub.cfg during kernel updates, when /boot is on a Btrfs subvolume. So I have no present

Re: booting btrfs

В Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:20:19 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a read only snapshot, then for no space cost also create a rw snapshot of the read only one, then add

Re: booting btrfs

2014/1/9 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: We snapshot /boot for kernel and initrd, otherwise the rollback would encounter problem of incompatible

Re: booting btrfs

On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: 2014/1/9 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: We snapshot /boot for kernel and

Re: booting btrfs

On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: We snapshot /boot for kernel and initrd, otherwise the rollback would encounter problem of incompatible userland and kernel/kernel modules. And we

Re: booting btrfs

On Jan 1, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: We snapshot /boot for kernel and initrd, otherwise the rollback would encounter problem of incompatible userland and kernel/kernel modules. And we need the ability to rollback them in terms of usefulness. Of course,

Re: booting btrfs

2014/1/1 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com: On Dec 31, 2013, at 12:50 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:52:36PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 30.12.2013

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 31, 2013, at 12:50 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:52:36PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 30.12.2013 11:18, Michael Chang wrote: On Mon, Dec 23, 2013

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:43:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Now I tend to agree that supporting config for snapshot booting shouldn't be upstream's consideration due to it's compliexity and dependency to system, Despite

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 30.12.2013 11:18, Michael Chang wrote: On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:43:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Now I tend to agree that

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 30.12.2013 11:18, Michael Chang wrote: On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:43:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Now I tend to agree that

Re: booting btrfs

On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:46:00AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: And very thankful for the $1 magic, it heals my headache of variable assignment per each (sub)menu entries. $1 is always menu entry title, you

Re: booting btrfs

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:52:36PM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 30.12.2013 11:18, Michael Chang wrote: On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:43:34PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 23, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Now I tend to agree that supporting config for snapshot booting shouldn't be upstream's consideration due to it's compliexity and dependency to system, Despite on this, I still like to ask : Did upstream think about any patch

Re: booting btrfs

On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: Another thing to note is that there are UEFI computers shipping that don't have USB initialized by the firmware by default at boot time. So the user couldn't use this menu on such systems - which some have suggested will become increasingly common.

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 23, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: Another thing to note is that there are UEFI computers shipping that don't have USB initialized by the firmware by default at boot time. So the user

Re: booting btrfs

On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a read only snapshot, then for no space cost also create a rw snapshot of the read only one, then add the rw snapshot to the grub.cfg. The tool could give the user the option to always revert the changes

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a read only snapshot, then for no space cost also create a rw snapshot of the read only one, then add the rw

Re: booting btrfs

On 24.12.2013 07:12, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a read only snapshot, then for no space cost also create a rw

Re: booting btrfs

2013/12/24 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com: On 24.12.2013 07:12, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:20 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 24.12.2013 04:43, Chris Murphy wrote: d point. Your snapshot tool could first create a

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 21, 2013, at 12:18 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: Do you need to reinvent the wheel? /Boot-Environments /Boot_Environment_1 /root /boot ... /Boot_Environment_2 ... The only thing you need to do to switch is equivalent of btrfs set-default

Re: booting btrfs

On 23.12.2013 05:45, Chris Murphy wrote: As for grub's part in the solution, it seems like it would need to understand absolute paths to subvol 5, as well as relative paths to the default subvol (set with the 'btrfs subvol set-default' command). It doesn't seem to me at all that relative paths

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 22, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 23.12.2013 05:45, Chris Murphy wrote: As for grub's part in the solution, it seems like it would need to understand absolute paths to subvol 5, as well as relative paths to the default subvol

Re: booting btrfs

2013/12/20 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com: On 19.12.2013 17:13, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: В Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:44:26 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: I changed in trunk to make / refer to real root and modified grub-mkrelpath to

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 20, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Every volume has a name, even if you don't know it. Use grub-mkrelpath to find out. That means we need to modify the grub,cfg in snapshot to make files used by config refer to new path output by grub-mkrelpath (relative to

Re: booting btrfs

В Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:38:47 -0700 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: On Dec 20, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Michael Chang mch...@suse.com wrote: Every volume has a name, even if you don't know it. Use grub-mkrelpath to find out. That means we need to modify the grub,cfg in snapshot

Re: booting btrfs

В Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:44:26 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: I changed in trunk to make / refer to real root and modified grub-mkrelpath to follow the same convention, even if disk is mounted with subvolid. Can it cause compatibility issues? It means if

Re: booting btrfs

On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 19.12.2013 17:13, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: В Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:44:26 +0100 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: I changed in trunk to make / refer to real root and

Re: booting btrfs

В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:12:06 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: So actually, this is a bit more than somewhat messy, whether the prefix should be formatted relative to the default subvolume, or absolute from top level 5 subvolume. It depends on the use case. So just like

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know whether it was the case in the past, but today there is *no* difference between using absolute or relative form. There is a difference because I have a case where one works and the other doesn't. But I

Re: booting btrfs

On 15.10.2013 21:47, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know whether it was the case in the past, but today there is *no* difference between using absolute or relative form. There is a difference because I have a case

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 15, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 15.10.2013 21:47, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know whether it was the case in the past, but today there is *no*

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: I do not know whether it was the case in the past, but today there is *no* difference between using absolute or relative form. OK so it's confirmed that with kernel 3.2 the subvol= behavior changed from relative to

Re: booting btrfs

В Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:47:14 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: I'm not sure when and how top level may become != 5. starting where you left off with the sub2 subvolume mounted # btrfs subvol create /mnt/nested # btrfs subvol list /mnt ID 262 gen 135 top level 5 path

Re: booting btrfs

В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:20:14 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: Is there a way to detect that mountinfo gives garbage and somehow get where the real root points? I don't know. I've asked on linux-btrfs@. Instead of rebooting, I merely tried mounting without options after

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: В Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:47:14 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: I'm not sure when and how top level may become != 5. starting where you left off with the sub2 subvolume mounted # btrfs subvol

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:20:14 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: Is there a way to detect that mountinfo gives garbage and somehow get where the real root points? I don't know. I've asked on

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 13, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: В Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:58:41 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: On Oct 13, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.10.2013 22:59, Chris Murphy wrote:

Re: booting btrfs

So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the default subvolume. This is not intentional. When this part of code was written there was no set-default available at all so this couldn't be tested and I simply followed the specification. It told to take root_tree and root_dir_objectid

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the default subvolume. This is not intentional. When this part of code was written there was no set-default available at all so this couldn't be

Re: booting btrfs

On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the default subvolume. This is not intentional. When this part of code was written there was no

Re: booting btrfs

On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the default subvolume. This is not intentional. When this part of code was written there was no

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the default subvolume. This is not intentional. When this part of code was written there was no set-default available at all so this couldn't be

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to the

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 14, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko

Re: booting btrfs

В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:50:10 +0200 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to

Re: booting btrfs

В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:01:45 +0200 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: So it seems that GRUB is using relative pathnames to

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Andrey Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote: В Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:50:10 +0200 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 14.10.2013 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 14, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko

booting btrfs

On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 26.09.2013 22:51, Chris Murphy wrote: Open question is if on BIOS hardware, if a 1MB BIOSBoot is preferred over the 64KB Btrfs bootloader pad? I don't know off hand if each member disk, or

Re: booting btrfs

On 13.10.2013 20:04, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 26.09.2013 22:51, Chris Murphy wrote: Open question is if on BIOS hardware, if a 1MB BIOSBoot is preferred over the 64KB Btrfs bootloader pad? I don't

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 13, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.10.2013 20:04, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 26.09.2013 22:51, Chris Murphy wrote: Open question is

Re: booting btrfs

On 13.10.2013 22:59, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 13, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.10.2013 20:04, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 26.09.2013

Re: booting btrfs

On Oct 13, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.10.2013 22:59, Chris Murphy wrote: How does one create a subvolume without a name? All subvolumes have had ID's since at least 2008, and it's been possible to mount by name or ID for quite

Re: booting btrfs

В Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:58:41 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: On Oct 13, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com wrote: On 13.10.2013 22:59, Chris Murphy wrote: How does one create a subvolume without a name? All subvolumes have had