On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:59:22PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2008 08:27:09 Bean wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:32 AM, David Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've just edumacated myself about how the platforms are defined.
> > >
> > > Let me get this stra
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 08:27:09 Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:32 AM, David Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just edumacated myself about how the platforms are defined.
> >
> > Let me get this straight, the efi platform does not yet support loading a
> > multiboot kernel?
>
2008/6/18 Andrei E. Warkentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, the mbi struct could have had a firmware type and firmware context
> pointer defined or something of the sort. This would also play nice with
> Multiboot on OF environments, without resorting to ugly hacks like always
> passing the OF entry
Well, the mbi struct could have had a firmware type and firmware
context pointer defined or something of the sort. This would also play
nice with Multiboot on OF environments, without resorting to ugly
hacks like always passing the OF entry in a GPR on entry.
18.06.2008, в 1:27, Bean напис
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:32 AM, David Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just edumacated myself about how the platforms are defined.
>
> Let me get this straight, the efi platform does not yet support loading a
> multiboot kernel?
>
> I'm working with embedded kernels here, not just Linux.
I've just edumacated myself about how the platforms are defined.
Let me get this straight, the efi platform does not yet support loading
a multiboot kernel?
I'm working with embedded kernels here, not just Linux.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-de
