Re: single-user mode string (Re: gettext patch (beta))

2009-02-27 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 07:40:35PM -0500, BandiPat wrote: Martin, our problem is that single-user mode is very confusing for those not experienced with Un*x. They tend to think this is the normal mode of operation since they are (usually) a single user. Any comments? Martin said it he was

Re: single-user mode string (Re: gettext patch (beta))

2009-02-21 Thread BandiPat
Robert Millan wrote: I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like rescue mode or recovery mode. Suggestions? -- I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the level the machine boots to, yet will be less confusing to the user as to why it's in

Re: single-user mode string (Re: gettext patch (beta))

2009-02-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:07:22AM -0500, BandiPat wrote: Robert Millan wrote: I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like rescue mode or recovery mode. Suggestions? -- I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the level the machine boots

Re: single-user mode string (Re: gettext patch (beta))

2009-02-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 09:10:15PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com [2009.02.21.2049 +0100]: Martin, our problem is that single-user mode is very confusing for those not experienced with Un*x. They tend to think this is the normal mode of operation

Re: single-user mode string (Re: gettext patch (beta))

2009-02-21 Thread BandiPat
Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:07:22AM -0500, BandiPat wrote: Robert Millan wrote: I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like rescue mode or recovery mode. Suggestions? -- I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the level