Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch splits realmode and loader routines out of startup.S. The idea
is that the LinuxBIOS port can be adapted to share more code with the rest
of GRUB instead of duplicating it.
This is quite critical stuff, so even if the change seems trivial
This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into i386/loader.h.
Comments?
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
2007-10-17 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
[...]
2007-10-17 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* include/grub/i386/loader.h: New file.
* include/grub/i386/pc/loader.h (grub_linux_prot_size): Moved to ...
* include/grub/i386/loader.h (grub_linux_prot_size): ... here.
Committed.
--
Robert Millan
GPLv2 I know my rights; I want my phone call!
DRM What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:32:28AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_prot_size): Moved to ...
* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_prot_size): ... here.
I would say:
(...): Moved from here...
(...): ... to here.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:04:14PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
Linking required wrapping a lot of references with EXT_C() macro, so I opted
for #include (note this is done for lzo1x.S already).
Is using EXT_C a problem? I don't know this code too well,
unfortunately :(
No. Maybe
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:46:16PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
That's what grub_ticksleep does. grub_sleep() counts in seconds because
I tried to mimic POSIX which seems to be a trend for grub_* functions. I
think it can be used for menu timeout
Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:04:14PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
Linking required wrapping a lot of references with EXT_C() macro, so I
opted
for #include (note this is done for lzo1x.S already).
Is using EXT_C a problem? I don't know this code
Robert Millan wrote:
This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into
i386/loader.h.
Comments?
Why did you move stuff from i386/pc to i386 ?
I do see a point on running grub2 on non-pc i386...
___
Grub-devel mailing list
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071014 14:00]:
We tried the same but the patch was a lot bigger, trying to actually
leave space in the beginning. Your patch might be enough, that would be
really nice.
That's the question. Do we really have to add more space, or is that space
already
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:17:54PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
This patch splits the i386-generic part of i386/pc/loader.h into
i386/loader.h.
Comments?
Why did you move stuff from i386/pc to i386 ?
I do see a point on running grub2 on non-pc i386...
It's
11 matches
Mail list logo