Hello,
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:36, Francis Gendreau wrote:
> My recommendation would be relatively simple. grub_guess_root_device()
> could simply call statfs() and extract the device name from struct
> statfs f_mntfromname, maybe as simply as the following, but I may lack
> of knowledge a
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 12:49, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> I think it would be more convenient to allow Bean and Alexandre to check in
> changes themselves. Is there any objection?
It seems that I don't get any objection. So can I proceed?
Since I'm a bit tired of writing the same thing many
On Dec 30, 2007 9:20 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 December 2007 12:49, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > I think it would be more convenient to allow Bean and Alexandre to check in
> > changes themselves. Is there any objection?
>
> It seems that I don't get any obj
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:33:58AM -0800, walt wrote:
> >>The other Athlon machine has one PATA drive on a VIA 8235 controller
> >>and one SATA drive on a Promise controller. This machine makes it
> >>through grub_ata_dumpinfo for both disks but then it hangs forever
> >>without printing anything
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:05:16PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is based on robert's memdisk patch. I also modify lnxboot
> so that it can load the memdisk using initrd. Changes:
I'd really like to keep this separate, and get memdisk merged first.
I recall Marco had some objections to
On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:32, Bean wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 9:20 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 December 2007 12:49, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > I think it would be more convenient to allow Bean and Alexandre to
> > > check in changes themselves. Is ther
What do we do about this? Keep updating the TODO file or get rif of it?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:02:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> It seems the TODO is horribly outdated, so I gave it a review. I think these
> are already fixed. Is it correct?
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
> I know my
Le dim 30 déc 2007 à 14:20:26 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji a écrit :
> On Tuesday 25 December 2007 12:49, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > I think it would be more convenient to allow Bean and Alexandre to check in
> > changes themselves. Is there any objection?
>
> It seems that I don't get any objecti
On Sunday 30 December 2007 16:14, Robert Millan wrote:
> What do we do about this? Keep updating the TODO file or get rif of it?
Personally, I think it is easier to just point to another place, such
as "Please look at this URL.", using the wiki (or an issue tracker, if you
prefer).
Thanks,
Ok
On Sunday 30 December 2007 17:07, Alexandre Boeglin wrote:
> Le dim 30 déc 2007 à 14:20:26 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 25 December 2007 12:49, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > I think it would be more convenient to allow Bean and Alexandre to
> > > check in changes themselves.
Hi All,
Here is a patch that adds background image support to gfxterm. At same
time I added some small optimizations that didn't need any extra memory.
I also added some new commands to video subsystem interface to make it
more easier to use it.
There are still some issues about saving and restor
Hi,
While I was traveling I wrote some thoughs about graphical menu. So if
you have any thoughs about it I would like that you check out it and
comment it in here.
http://grub.enbug.org/Subprojects/GraphicalMenu
I don't know when I have next time free time to work on it so please be
free to disc
12 matches
Mail list logo
