On Feb 17, 2008 2:29 AM, Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2008 2:12 AM, walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 00:43 +0800, Bean wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Anyway, i think the bsd module should be fine, here is the whole
> > > patch, if nobody objects, i would like to
On Feb 20, 2008 2:19 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:14 +0800, Bean wrote:
>
> > That's because core.img is a.out format multiboot kernel, but the
> > current multiboot loader can only handle elf format. My bsd patch add
> > a.out support for multiboot. with t
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:14 +0800, Bean wrote:
> That's because core.img is a.out format multiboot kernel, but the
> current multiboot loader can only handle elf format. My bsd patch add
> a.out support for multiboot. with that, you can load core.img
> successfully.
It's working, thanks! Just on
Hi,
Remake this patch so that it can be applied to current cvs head, also
merge with the joliet extension patch for iso9660.
If nobody objects, i would like to check it in.
2008-02-19 Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* fs/iso9660.c (GRUB_ISO9660_VOLDESC_BOOT): New macro.
(GRUB_ISO9660
I was wondering if anyone is doing any testing of Grub 2 on intel
Macintosh computers. A test matrix someone would be nice for the
status status of the various systems (mac mini, macbooks, mac pro, and
xserve). I'm so happy new options are coming for EFI, thanks!
-Daedius
__
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 02:33 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 2:19 AM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:14 +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > > That's because core.img is a.out format multiboot kernel, but the
> > > current multiboot loader can only handle elf format.
Hi Timothy,
I just came across your old mails about RISC OS port in grub-devel archive.
Please, can you tell us what's the current status wrt getting your port
merged? I'd like to have a look at what's missing.
Thanks!
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a
