Hi all,
I have a question regarding grub2 in relation with UEFI secure boot. I
do use a grub2 efi binary which is signed with sbsigntools. If the grub2
starts I think there is in general no information about that the grub2
is booted in secure boot environment.
Is there a possibility to show that
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:21:19AM +0100, Dennis Wassenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question regarding grub2 in relation with UEFI secure boot. I
> do use a grub2 efi binary which is signed with sbsigntools. If the grub2
> starts I think there is in general no information about that the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:58:37PM -0800, h...@zytor.com wrote:
[...]
> Multiboot has a fundamentally broken assumption, which is to do certain work
Just to be precise. We are talking about Multiboot2 here.
> for the kernel in the bootloader. This is fundamentally a bad idea, because
Why it
On 02/16/17 15:27, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> That is obvious. Do you think that Multiboot/Multiboot2 protocols are
> substantially suboptimal?
>
Yes. They push a lot of things into the bootloader for no good reason,
thus tying the kernel's hands and making the whole boot process more
fragile.
