Re: workaround install boot on btrfs with windows partition scheme

2014-11-02 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Sun, 2 Nov 2014 15:19:43 -0700 Chris Murphy пишет: > > On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:37 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > В Sat, 1 Nov 2014 19:34:56 -0600 > > Chris Murphy пишет: > > > >> > >> On Oct 30, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >>> > >>> I still believe this is more flexible

Re: workaround install boot on btrfs with windows partition scheme

2014-11-02 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Sun, 2 Nov 2014 15:11:29 -0700 Chris Murphy пишет: > > On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > В Sat, 1 Nov 2014 14:35:57 -0600 > > Chris Murphy пишет: > >> > >> Why not have a dedicated partition with MBR type code for core.img, > >> equivalent to BIOSBoot currently us

Re: workaround install boot on btrfs with windows partition scheme

2014-11-02 Thread Michael Chang
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:42:29PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Chang wrote: > > Many shipped Windows created it's first partition aligned in 63 > > (cylinder) and therefore can't offer enough room for core.img. Even > > worse the partitions has been c

Re: workaround install boot on btrfs with windows partition scheme

2014-11-02 Thread Chris Murphy
On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:37 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Sat, 1 Nov 2014 19:34:56 -0600 > Chris Murphy пишет: > >> >> On Oct 30, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >>> >>> I still believe this is more flexible; in particular, /boot/grub on >>> btrfs has problems with unwritable grube

Re: workaround install boot on btrfs with windows partition scheme

2014-11-02 Thread Chris Murphy
On Nov 1, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Sat, 1 Nov 2014 14:35:57 -0600 > Chris Murphy пишет: >> >> Why not have a dedicated partition with MBR type code for core.img, >> equivalent to BIOSBoot currently used on GPT? freedesktop.org has a proposal >> to use type code 0xEA for