Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC

2009-01-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
x27;listadmin'. I probably won't be subscribed to this list for long, please keep me CC'd on followups. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer --- grub2-1.96+200812

Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC

2009-01-27 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 18:54 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > P.S. Please reconsider automatically rejecting posts from > > non-subscribers. I co-moderate half a dozen mailing lists, only costs me > > a couple of minutes a day thanks to a nice t

Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC

2009-01-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 21:57 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:19 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > I was able to reproduce Jordi's findings on my PowerBook G4. (Well, > > except device.map seems to get generated correctly and the search > > command s

Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC)

2009-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:38 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Quoting Robert Millan : > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> +/* > >> + * unsigned char caseorder[] > >> + * > >> + * Defines the

Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC)

2009-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:19 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 11:38:36PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > Quoting Robert Millan : > > > > >On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >>+/* > > >>+ * unsigned

Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC)

2009-02-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
be clear now what the problem is and how it can be fixed; I've already spent more time on this than I was planning and will now unsubscribe from this list again. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://www.vmware.com Libre softw

Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC)

2009-02-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 15:47 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Michel may know better, but I think it's the order of characters. > > > Those with the lower order go first in the sorted binary tree.