On 2024-04-12 14:13, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 4/12/24 04:39, Gary Lin via Grub-devel wrote:
From: Patrick Colp
If a protector is specified, but it fails to unlock the disk, fall back
to asking for the passphrase. However, an error was set indicating that
the protector(s) failed. Later code (e
Update linux_kernel_params to match the latest upstream (v6.13.7)
version of boot_params. Refactor most things out into structs, as the
Linux kernel does.
`edid_info` should be a struct with `unsigned char dummy[128]` and
`efi_info` should be a struct as well, starting at 0x1c0. However, for
backw
Update linux_kernel_params to match the latest upstream (v6.13.77)
version of boot_params. Refactor most things out into structs, as the
Linux kernel does.
"edid_info" should be a struct with "unsigned char dummy[128]" and
"efi_info" should be a struct as well, starting at 0x1c0. However, for
back
Update linux_kernel_params to match the latest upstream
v2:
- Changed commit message to replace ` with "
- Fixed formatting of multi-line comments
- Updated names of fields in efi_info structs to match upstream
- Adjusted alignment of inline comments describing offsets to be more uniform
Patrick
