On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 12:18:13PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:37:19 +0100
> Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > The global "have_it" was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used
> > > to
> > > determine
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:37:19 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > The global "have_it" was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
> > determine if a crypto-backend successfully mounted a cryptodisk with a given
> > uuid. This
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> The global "have_it" was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
> determine if a crypto-backend successfully mounted a cryptodisk with a given
> uuid. This is not needed however, because grub_device_iterate() will return
The global "have_it" was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
determine if a crypto-backend successfully mounted a cryptodisk with a given
uuid. This is not needed however, because grub_device_iterate() will return
1 if and only if grub_cryptodisk_scan_device() returns 1. And
