On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
So if the table is basicaly storing values that enumerate something, why are
we using hex to represent them? Hex gives the impression they're an opaque
sort of thing, like code, bitmasks or magic numbers.
Your guess is as
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 15:47 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Michel may know better, but I think it's the order of characters.
Those with the lower order go first in the sorted binary tree. Those
with the same order are
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:38 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+/*
+ * unsigned char caseorder[]
+ *
+ * Defines the lexical ordering of characters on the Macintosh
+ *
+ * Composition
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:19 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 11:38:36PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+/*
+ * unsigned char caseorder[]
+ *
+ * Defines the lexical
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Could you be more specific about what the table contents mean?
BTW, let me point out again that this table including comment is a
verbatim copy from the Linux kernel fs/hfs/string.c . Sorry if I didn't
make this clear enough in
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:50:18AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
BTW, let me point out again that this table including comment is a
verbatim copy from the Linux kernel fs/hfs/string.c . Sorry if I didn't
make this clear enough in my original post.
Ugh, welcome our GPLv3 party. v2 members not
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:06 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:50:18AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
BTW, let me point out again that this table including comment is a
verbatim copy from the Linux kernel fs/hfs/string.c . Sorry if I didn't
make this clear enough in my
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:54:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+static unsigned char caseorder[256] = {
+
0x00,0x01,0x02,0x03,0x04,0x05,0x06,0x07,0x08,0x09,0x0A,0x0B,0x0C,0x0D,0x0E,0x0F,
Could you be more specific about what the table contents mean?
BTW, let me point out
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 11:38:36PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Quoting Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+/*
+ * unsigned char caseorder[]
+ *
+ * Defines the lexical ordering of characters on the Macintosh
+ *
+ * Composition
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+/*
+ * unsigned char caseorder[]
+ *
+ * Defines the lexical ordering of characters on the Macintosh
+ *
+ * Composition of the 'casefold' and 'order' tables from ARDI's code
+ * with the entry for 0x20 changed to match that
Quoting Robert Millan r...@aybabtu.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
+/*
+ * unsigned char caseorder[]
+ *
+ * Defines the lexical ordering of characters on the Macintosh
+ *
+ * Composition of the 'casefold' and 'order' tables from ARDI's code
+ * with the
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 21:57 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:19 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I was able to reproduce Jordi's findings on my PowerBook G4. (Well,
except device.map seems to get generated correctly and the search
command seems to work for me, maybe this is
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 08:19 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I was able to reproduce Jordi's findings on my PowerBook G4. (Well,
except device.map seems to get generated correctly and the search
command seems to work for me, maybe this is due to differences between
our OF device trees or something
Michel Dänzer wrote:
P.S. Please reconsider automatically rejecting posts from
non-subscribers. I co-moderate half a dozen mailing lists, only costs me
a couple of minutes a day thanks to a nice tool called 'listadmin'.
grub-devel is a subscriber only list.
I was able to reproduce Jordi's findings on my PowerBook G4. (Well,
except device.map seems to get generated correctly and the search
command seems to work for me, maybe this is due to differences between
our OF device trees or something like that)
After some printf-style debugging over the
Hello,
Just a little correction, I was really tired when I wrote this down the
other day:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:00:19AM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
On the command-line, I copied the search --fs-uuid --set line from my
grub.cfg, and
1) it printed no such device and errored out ($?=12,
I'm working in a patch to make the install process better. I ĺl send it
soon, once some license issues are resolved.
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 01:00 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Hello list,
Many months after my last try, I've given GRUB2 a go on my G4-based Apple
laptop.
For this, I used
Hello list,
Many months after my last try, I've given GRUB2 a go on my G4-based Apple
laptop.
For this, I used Debian's 1st of December snapshot packaged to experimental.
Thanks to daChaac, the IRC hero once again ;) the executive summary changed
from frustrating failure to works with quite a
18 matches
Mail list logo
