Re: [RFC][PATCH] Allow hotkeys to interrupt hidden menu

2013-10-21 Thread Franz Hsieh
Hi Vladimir, I don't know if l lose any update from you. Would you give me comments about the latest hotkey patch? Summary of the patch: * allow function keys / delete / backspace to interrupt sleep and set 'hotkey' variable. * remove key aliases structure. * using grub_xasprintf

Adding secure boot to the GRUB

2013-10-21 Thread Vijayakumar Venganti
Hi Friends, I want to add secure boot library to the GRUB boot loader to sign the linux image. My secure boot code base is Secure boot Directoty - contains set of .C and .H file and a Make file which generates a BINARY under /bin folder. When it is integrated with GRUB i want to pass the

Re: Adding secure boot to the GRUB

2013-10-21 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 21.10.2013 17:04, Vijayakumar Venganti wrote: Hi Friends, I want to add secure boot library to the GRUB boot loader to sign the linux image. My secure boot code base is Secure boot Directoty - contains set of .C and .H file and a Make file which generates a BINARY under /bin

Re: RFC: should the 'trust' and 'verify_detached' commands respect 'check_signatures=enforce'?

2013-10-21 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 18.10.2013 04:44, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: В Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:44:05 +0200 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет: On 17.10.2013 20:28, Jonathan McCune wrote: Presently the 'trust' and 'verify_detached' commands disable all filters (e.g., verify.c:grub_cmd_trust()

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote: [...] Separate multiboot2efi module should be established. It should verify system kernel and all loaded modules using shim on EFI platforms with enabled secure

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Jan Beulich
On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote: (Looking at the Cc list it's quite interesting that you copied a whole lot of people, but not me as the maintainer of the EFI bits in Xen.) Separate multiboot2efi module should be established. It should verify system kernel and

EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Kiper
Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2 implementation calls ExitBootServices() on them just before jumping into loaded image. In

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote: (Looking at the Cc list it's quite interesting that you copied a whole lot of people, but not me as the maintainer of the EFI bits in Xen.) I see this: From:

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Peter Jones
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:56PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2 implementation calls

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:54:38AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:56PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range of memory types

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.10.13 at 16:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote: [...] What do you

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Mail is big, I think I got your essential points but I didn't read it whole. On 21.10.2013 14:57, Daniel Kiper wrote: Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range of memory types available on

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Seth Goldberg
Quoting Daniel Kiper, who wrote the following on Mon, 21 Oct 2013: Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2 implementation

Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

2013-10-21 Thread Seth Goldberg
Quoting Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, who wrote the following on...: On 21.10.2013 22:53, Seth Goldberg wrote: Quoting Daniel Kiper, who wrote the following on Mon, 21 Oct 2013: Hi, During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered that memory map passed via