Hi Vladimir,
I don't know if l lose any update from you. Would you give me comments
about
the latest hotkey patch?
Summary of the patch:
* allow function keys / delete / backspace to interrupt sleep and set
'hotkey' variable.
* remove key aliases structure.
* using grub_xasprintf
Hi Friends,
I want to add secure boot library to the GRUB boot loader to sign the
linux image.
My secure boot code base is
Secure boot Directoty - contains set of .C and .H file and a Make
file which generates a BINARY under /bin folder.
When it is integrated with GRUB i want to pass the
On 21.10.2013 17:04, Vijayakumar Venganti wrote:
Hi Friends,
I want to add secure boot library to the GRUB boot loader to sign the
linux image.
My secure boot code base is
Secure boot Directoty - contains set of .C and .H file and a
Make file which generates a BINARY under /bin
On 18.10.2013 04:44, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:44:05 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com пишет:
On 17.10.2013 20:28, Jonathan McCune wrote:
Presently the 'trust' and 'verify_detached' commands disable all filters
(e.g., verify.c:grub_cmd_trust()
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
[...]
Separate multiboot2efi module should be established. It should verify system
kernel and all loaded modules using shim on EFI platforms with enabled
secure
On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
(Looking at the Cc list it's quite interesting that you copied a
whole lot of people, but not me as the maintainer of the EFI
bits in Xen.)
Separate multiboot2efi module should be established. It should verify system
kernel and
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2
implementation calls ExitBootServices() on them just before jumping
into loaded image. In
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
(Looking at the Cc list it's quite interesting that you copied a
whole lot of people, but not me as the maintainer of the EFI
bits in Xen.)
I see this:
From:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:56PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2
implementation calls
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:54:38AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:57:56PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
of memory types
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.10.13 at 16:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.10.13 at 14:57, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
[...]
What do you
Mail is big, I think I got your essential points but I didn't read it whole.
On 21.10.2013 14:57, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
of memory types available on
Quoting Daniel Kiper, who wrote the following on Mon, 21 Oct 2013:
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via relevant tag could not represent wide range
of memory types available on EFI platforms. Additionally, GRUB2
implementation
Quoting Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, who wrote the following on...:
On 21.10.2013 22:53, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Quoting Daniel Kiper, who wrote the following on Mon, 21 Oct 2013:
Hi,
During work on multiboot2 protocol support for Xen it was discovered
that memory map passed via
14 matches
Mail list logo