All fixed, see below.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just installed the latest gsll and gsl (1.14) on
red-hat/linux/64-bit sbcl 1.0.34 on . A couple observations on (what
I think are) minor unit-tests errors and failures.
*** CHOLESKY:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Zhang Mian mzh...@shao.ac.cn wrote:
Finally I resolved it. This is what i did:
(1) installed all components of ASDF libs
(2) libgsl-unix.lisp which is in /gsll/init is revised
#+darwin
(cc-flags -I/your_GSL_header_.h_path
(3) init.lisp which is
to the Jacobin matrix. I just exported the jacobian function in
the attached patch.
Cheers,
Russell
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 22:45 -0400, Liam Healy wrote:
Hmm, so it does. I'm wondering if fit-test-delta is always
called with last-step and current-position derived from the
same fit object
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com wrote:
The following is my experience on 64-bit RedHat Enterprise Linux and
emacs 23.1. I am slowly learning the meaning of `bleeding edge'
hardware software.
*64-bit*
I cannot link to 64-bit libraries. I had to use
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:02 AM, N J raphex...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net wrote:
I'm not sure what you're looking for here, but I've never
had GSL libraries not loadable (not sure what you mean
here; not found in the path?). Doesn't
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com wrote:
See below:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net wrote:
I'm not sure what you're looking for here, but I've never
had GSL libraries not loadable (not sure what you mean
here; not found
Thanks, fixed; that was an especially bad mistake since the dependencies line
I actually use is correct. I'm hoping to get GSLL and friends added to
the official clbuild soon so this won't be necessary.
Liam
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:01 PM, James Wright ja...@chumsley.org wrote:
Hi all,
error, I think none are counted
in the passes. So that may be where most of the
4000 tests went.
Liam
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Sam Steingold s...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Liam,
On 8/7/10, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net wrote:
Are you using an old GSLL? There should be ~4000 tests
now
at 11:10 PM, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net
wrote:
OK I've committed a modified version of this patch. I hope
it works better for OS X.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Leo sdl@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010-08-16 15:51 +0100, David Dreisigmeyer wrote:
I tried this -- no go, including
Thanks James. I have applied your patch. I have also added the tests
in the file tests/rank-1-update.lisp. Despite what it says in the
comments about it being automatically generated, there's a fair amount
of manual intervention needed to create the tests, so it's not
surprising you were unable
Forwarded on behalf of Sebastian Sturm:
Dear all,
I have been trying to use gsll for some numerical minimization.
Allocating the multi-dimensional-root-solver-fdf with scalarsp set to
false, I understand that I should provide functions f, df and fdf
which accept (pointers to) foreign-arrays
Sebastian,
Can you temporarily define this and find the timing/consing for your
test case:
(defmethod gref* ((object vector-double-float) linearized-index)
(cffi:mem-aref
(foreign-pointer object)
:double
linearized-index))
(I think you don't use any matrices but if you do, define an
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com wrote:
I can go from foreign arrays to cl-arrays:
(grid:copy-to #m(1.0d0 2.0d0) 'grid::array)
(although the use of the *internal* symbol `array' puzzles me)
So, why did you use it?
(copy-to #m(1.0d0 2.0d0) 'array)
Thanks, fixed and pushed. That whole with-ode-integration is a bit hackish
and maybe could use some rethinking, if you have any ideas.
Liam
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Fedor Bezrukov
fedor.bezru...@physik.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
I guess next-step should be exported
---
Sumant,
I think this has something to do with the initial contents
(time (type-of (make-foreign-array 'double-float :dimensions '(1024 1024
Evaluation took:
0.001 seconds of real time
0.00 seconds of total run time (0.00 user, 0.00 system)
0.00% CPU
341,884 processor
These correspond in the following way to the BLAS symbols:
:trans = CblasTrans
:notrans = CblasNoTrans
:conjtrans = CblasConjTrans.
That is, transpose, no transpose, conjugate transpose. Look at the BLAS
documentation for more information; unfortunately, the GSL BLAS
documentation like
Yuan,
Thanks for the patch. I don't use MacOSX so I can't test it, but I've
committed it. If possible, in the future please join the mailing list
and post your items there. As far as your CFFI suggestions go, I
encourage you to post them on the cffi-devel list; Mac users seem to
have a lot of
, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net wrote:
Yuan,
Thanks for the patch. I don't use MacOSX so I can't test it, but I've
committed it. If possible, in the future please join the mailing list
and post your items there. As far as your CFFI suggestions go, I
encourage you to post them on the cffi
Hi Sumant,
Thanks for this interesting analysis. It is encouraging to me that the FFT
itself is only a small fraction of the total time taken, and therefore
there is opportunity for real speed improvement.
Here is my breakdown:
1. FFT only (Checks 2 and 3): 10%
2. make-urand-vector: 90%
No idea. It should just load it; I think that's what happens for me.
Liam
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:58 PM, JTK jetm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I noticed that when I load gssl, antik recompiles (see below).
Is this normal? I would expect it to reuse the compiled fasls.
This is the
-foreign-library libgsl
(:darwin libgsl.dylib)
(:cygwin cyggsl-0.dll)
(:unix (:or libgsl.so.0 libgsl.so))
(t (:default libgsl)))
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net
wrote:
In light of this:
http://lispcaveats.tumblr.com/post/13259176455/ffi-linking
On this and other mailing lists, there have been recent discussions of
numerical lisp which in one aspect or another has been the vision of many
of us, some for many years. My approach is to write libraries I think will
form a piece of the overall solution, with the hope that others will join
in
Hi Akshay,
Thank you for your work and your email.
I think a lot of people have had very similar thoughts to yours, and
have started down the road meeting the needs of users they've
identified. There are a lot of good and partially overlapping ideas
within this loosely organized group of
CFFI 0.11.0 was released last week. This includes cffi-libffi, which
makes FSBV obsolete. The new versions of Antik and GSLL now use
cffi-libffi instead of FSBV. For most users of these systems, this is
an internal detail and unimportant. However, for the past 6 months at
least, I have been
Thanks for the report, fixed in 1107fc49bc, currently on the
antik-multiple-systems branch but merged into master soon.
Liam
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.comwrote:
matrix-product in blas3.lisp calls the gsl_blas gemm routine. It has
optional parameters
Thanks. Fixed in dfbc975074, currently on the antik-multiple-systems
branch.
Liam
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have been spending enjoyable time with gsll's (and gsl's) histogram
routines.
A small bug in the code popped up. In
If you have a patch, I'll consider it.
Liam
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
GSLL uses the Osicat library for the only purpose of obtaining a valid
temporary directory.
The new ASDF 3 (actually UIOP) offers the same functionality.
Thanks for your email and patch. I had noticed that integration-qag
appeared to be non-reentrant a couple years ago, and made a little progress
into diagnosing the problem, but didn't get as far as you have. I think
your solution is a good start. As far as callbacks defined through
defmobject, it
That's pretty much a normal number of failures, though the execution error
shouldn't happen. The decision on whether to use GSLL is up to you, you
have to evaluate the failures and decide whether they're relevant to your
intended application. Note that most of them are slight numerical
this mixup.
Liam
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Liam Healy lhe...@common-lisp.net wrote:
The git repositories and development pages for Antik and GSLL are now on
gitlab.common-lisp.net under the antik group:
https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/groups/antik
If you clone/pull directly from the git
The git repositories and development pages for Antik and GSLL are now on
gitlab.common-lisp.net under the antik group:
https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/groups/antik
If you clone/pull directly from the git repositories, update the URL as the
old locations have been deleted. Those who get the
n Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:40 AM, David Catteeuw davidcatte...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Munawar,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Munawar Cheema munawar.a.che...@gmail.com
wrote:
I installed gsll from quicklisp. I had to manually give values for the
libgsl and libgslclas to get the install to work.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the excellent gsll package (in the first instance), to provide
> an interface to quadpack for the mathematics system FriCAS. I'm slowly
> going through calculus/numerical-integration.lisp one
. Even if it is not accepted, I learned something, and it was fun.
>> And I can
>> keep it on my GSLL so that it runs for me.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Mirko
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Liam Healy <lhe...@comm
I think this might be a readtable problem associated with CCL. I hope
the Antik commit 03507b1b0667, which is the HEAD of the December
quicklisp release, has fixed this.
Thanks,
Liam
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Munawar Cheema
wrote:
> I tried to check this on my
The original code looks right to me.
You have taken the generic function and the associated foreign vector
methods #'permute and gratuitously renamed them #'permute-vector,
leaving the method for raw C pointer with the original name and no
generic function. Then you completely delete the generic
reply.
> Gaya
>
> On Aug 20, 2017 5:28 AM, "Liam Healy" <lhe...@common-lisp.net> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the report. You are right that the interface is wrong, but
>> oddly I have not encountered a problem. I'm not sure what the second
>> argumen
37 matches
Mail list logo