On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 16:06 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 14:58 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
I've attached one that compiles thusly:
gcc -o gladetest gladetest.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0
libglade-2.0`
The attachment doesn't seem to have made it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:49:46PM +0100, David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:05:27PM -0600, Shixin Zeng wrote:
[...]
2)How its intefaces handled, when a class is derived? Will the child
classes possess the same interfaces, if
A point I miss in the tutorial is to mention the
G_DEFINE_TYPE()-like macros which should be prefered over
manually defining a _get_type() function whenever possible.
I never did get that G_DEFINE_TYPE() stuff at all... It'd be
good to see some clear documentation on it.
The
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:47 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
The testlibglade program that comes with libglade is about 100
lines of code + some helpfull comments about using the library
and about how the library works.
I hope that this source file in the libglade tarball was easy
to find.
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 10:28 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 09:47 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
The testlibglade program that comes with libglade is about 100
lines of code + some helpfull comments about using the library
and about how the library works.
I hope
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 14:16 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
PS: This is not a personal thing, countless hordes have come in
search of a libglade example without ever consulting the tarball,
its just getting a little frustrating by now - but what can we do
to improve the situation ?
I was
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:53 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
[...]
One thing that might help here is to have a compiled executable that
demonstrates libglade be installed as part of the normal compilation
process. This would then be picked up by the packagers and installed as
part of the -devel
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 14:03 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:12 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Somehow I think that downloading the actual tarball from wherever the
website of a said software said to go download it from is much more
obvious a place then in a -devel
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:03:29PM -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
In any event, if a user wants to develop with
libglade, he'd need to install the rpms or debs or whatever. Most users
aren't going to be using the raw tarballs.
Install it and use it are two very different things.
Sure, one
