Re: Should gtk_widget_draw be un-depreicated?

2009-12-05 Thread Thomas Wood
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:01 -0600, Harry Coin wrote: If there is a non-deprecated way to start a timer as soon as an image is known to be drawn without using gtk_widget_draw I'd need to be educated about it. If not I think there is a good argument to not deprecate gtk_widget_draw.

Re: Should gtk_widget_draw be un-depreicated?

2009-12-05 Thread Nicola Fontana
Il giorno Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:01:25 -0600 Harry Coin hc...@quietfountain.com ha scritto: The only answer I can think of to retain the ability to time most accurately, starting the moment that the image has been drawn is to use gtk_widget_draw right after setting the pixbuf. If

Re: Should gtk_widget_draw be un-depreicated?

2009-12-05 Thread Harry Coin
Thanks all. I'll just do the gtk_window_process_updates and that is that! Nicola Fontana wrote: Il giorno Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:01:25 -0600 Harry Coin hc...@quietfountain.com ha scritto: The only answer I can think of to retain the ability to time most accurately, starting the moment that

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

2009-12-05 Thread Carlos Pereira
Dear Emmanuele, yes. and that, apart from games and scientific/technical applications, it's not at all common. the amount of code using OpenGL is relatively limited (hence niche) compared to the rest of applications in the GNOME stack (or even in the whole Linux ecosystem); it's *usage*

Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)

2009-12-05 Thread David Nečas
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote: We must atract more scientifc/engineering applications for Linux and GTK, because this is exactly the kind of stuff that enterprises and universities are demanding. If we have fantastic operating systems and desktop