Do you have an other thread?
May be concurrency problems?
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 01:43 -0500, Chris Moller wrote:
Okay, I'm out of ideas...
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment spinbutton A, its callback
then
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
Okay, I'm out of ideas...
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment spinbutton A, its callback
then updates values in B and C. B and then
Dne 05.03.2014 (sre) ob 18:38 +1100 je Chris Angelico napisal(a):
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
Interesting, if I were you I would try to share the same adjustment
between all of your views.
I.e. I would keep the adjustment in the
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even
without no blocking of any kind. So, if this is a bug at all, I suppose
it could be
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm using
gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks out and make
them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even without no
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even
Le 05/03/2014 18:07, Chris Vine a écrit :
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal,
On 03/05/14 12:07, Chris Vine wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level,
Le 05/03/2014 19:43, Chris Moller a écrit :
[...]
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to
use them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the
enclosing function, thereby minimising the amount of information you
have to pass. This is especially
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to use
them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the enclosing
function, thereby minimising the amount of information you have to pass.
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:43:29 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
On 03/05/14 12:07, Chris Vine wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation:
I'm using gcc and my callbacks
On 03/05/14 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to use
them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the enclosing
function, thereby minimising the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
On 03/05/14 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
Is there a reason you're trying to write high-level code in C?
Habit, mostly. I've been coding in C since the early 80s and I can do it in
my sleep. Python's okay, but I tend
Okay, I'm out of ideas...
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment spinbutton A, its callback
then updates values in B and C. B and then would try to update A, and
C, etc., resulting in a bottomless recursion. So,
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 18:01 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment spinbutton A, its callback
then updates
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
No, they're not the same value. They're all for setting an angle, in
radians, pi-radians, and degrees, and I want the user to be able to set the
angle in any unit and have the equivalent angle in the other units show up
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 02:20 -0500, Chris Moller wrote:
On 03/05/14 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
Interesting, if I were you I would try to share the same adjustment
between all of your views.
I.e. I would keep the adjustment in the finest grained unit of each
unit you want to display, and have your spin
18 matches
Mail list logo
