Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for download at: is this really a correct description of 2.21: Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.21.5 to 2.21.6 == * Most drawing done by GTK+

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:52 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for download at: is this really a correct description of

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: New functionality is available in both when it makes sense to do so, and deprecated functionality is marked as much. You shouldn't see any difference in usage if you don't use the new functionality. We distribute a

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/18/10 12:50, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I don't see how that follows. All that is happening in 2.22 is that some things are

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Jose Aliste
Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/18/10 12:50, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Jose Aliste jose.ali...@gmail.com wrote: After looking at the git log, you interpret correctly, but  I fail to see why do you perceive this as being bad. So, some GDK API is marked as deprecated, it seems fair to me that Gtk+ maintainers ensure the deprecated

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-20 Thread Jose Aliste
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Jose Aliste jose.ali...@gmail.com wrote: After looking at the git log, you interpret correctly, but  I fail to see why do you perceive this as being bad. So, some GDK API is marked

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:52 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for download at: is this really a correct description of 2.21: Overview of Changes from GTK+ 2.21.5 to 2.21.6

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:14 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 11:52 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: GTK+ 2.21.6 is now available for

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-18 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: New functionality is available in both when it makes sense to do so, and deprecated functionality is marked as much. You shouldn't see any

Re: GTK+ 2.21.6

2010-08-18 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On 08/18/10 12:50, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I don't see how that follows. All that is happening in 2.22 is that some things are getting deprecated. You can still use them. We are not going to take them away from you