Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-18 Thread Stefan Kost
Michael Torrie schrieb: > jvette...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >> I find that deriving classes in C++ is alot easier than going through >> the GObject type system. > > Yes this is true, in C. GTKmm makes things rather nice if you work in > C++. In fact I kind of like how GTKmm works without a

Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-15 Thread Michael Torrie
jvette...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > I find that deriving classes in C++ is alot easier than going through > the GObject type system. Yes this is true, in C. GTKmm makes things rather nice if you work in C++. In fact I kind of like how GTKmm works without a preprocessor, with type-safe call

Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-15 Thread jvetterli
Some of my thoughts on the matter: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:10:42AM -0600, Thomas Stover wrote: > ... > -QT (last time I checked) is not even C++. It's C++ and a custom macro > language. building ouch. debugging ouch. C++ paradigm ouch. The Qt macros aren't very intrusive. Once you have your

Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-14 Thread Iain *
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Jack wrote: > I believe the original question was gkt+ vs qt. I don't believe there was a question And this is all fairly offtopic for this list. So lets stop it now before it gets silly. iain ___ gtk-app-devel-list mai

Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-14 Thread Jack
been some interesting issues, but it is certainly possible. (See my other post on problems parsing rc files.) From: "Andersen, Jan" To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:22:47 PM Subject: RE: qt vs gtk As someone who has re

Re: qt vs gtk

2009-01-14 Thread Michael Torrie
a "sudo" like approach that mirrors OS X (ubuntu) for doing things that require root. Of course all of this is going away soon now that PolicyKit is hitting mainstream. This means root access simply isn't needed anymore for almost a

RE: qt vs gtk

2009-01-14 Thread Andersen, Jan
important that my tools don't work against me; GNOME did, KDE doesn't. -Original Message- From: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org on behalf of Thomas Stover Sent: Wed 14-Jan-09 16:10 To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: qt vs gtk With the recent news that Nokia will be releasing Q

qt vs gtk

2009-01-14 Thread Thomas Stover
With the recent news that Nokia will be releasing QT under LGPL, I'm seeing allot of knee-jerk anti-GTK comments out there. I know I'm preaching to the choir on this list, but for the sake of moral I thought I would post my 2 cents on the matter. -I can't think of single QT application I even