On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkomt...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi John,
I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
And I'm also surprised that this code is not working for you.
The last time I looked at size negotiation, the
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request()
when reporting its natural size:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043
2. Nor does it take into account gtk_label_set_width_chars():
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:56 PM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkomt...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi John,
I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
And I'm also surprised that
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request() when
reporting its natural size:
Hi Tristan,
This makes a bit more sense now.
On 12/05/2011 09:27 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgrenjohn.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account
I don't really understand what max-width-chars would be useful for.
Can't you set a natural size for a widget instead of a natural max
char width? If I want to ellipsize it won't do me any good if
... is the same as
I can see there is gtk_set_size_request for setting minimum width,
Hi, All
I got a error when I compile gtk3 in OSX .
This is log.
.
.
CCLD libgtk-3.la
CC queryimmodules.o
CCLD gtk-query-immodules-3.0
GISCAN Gtk-3.0.gir
Usage: g-ir-scanner [options] sources
g-ir-scanner: error: no such option: -x
make[4]: *** [Gtk-3.0.gir] Error
I was thinking of making a g_strrpl and g_strnrpl
The first one takes (gchar*,gchar*) and returns a gchar* in which the all
instances of the second gchar* will be found and replaced in the first
gchar*.
The second one is the same, but only replaces the first n instances.
But what i would like to