On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 08:59 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kip,
Hey John,
There are two easy ways to do a long operation in Python.
First, with idle_add(). Your callback should run for no more than 50ms
or so
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 15:08 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 08:59 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kip,
Hey John,
There are two easy ways to do a long operation in Python.
First, with
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
What you can do to (try to) prevent that situation is to set the widget to
do height for width allocation, and override
get_preferred_height_for_width() to honor your aspect ratio. In some
situations of course the
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
e.g. --
gtk_list_store_clear (store);
g_object_unref( G_OBJECT (store) );
g_object_unref ( G_OBJECT (
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
e.g. --
gtk_list_store_clear
On 06/14/13 13:24, Andrew Potter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
On 14 June 2013 07:29, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
Hey Tristan. I see what you mean, but I think I should have provided
more code to show that what I was actually doing I think was what your
followup suggestion was. Namely do some short work, update the GUI, do
some more short work,
I this is the wrong list, but I am active here... so why not start here
While editing the project C/C++ Build settings I somehow got the window
to shrink horizontally to be a single vertical bar.
If I hit ESC the window closes. The edges won't drag
Anyone seen this before?
Tom
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it right?)?
What are you monitoring, and how ?
It
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt change the memory
usage by a bit.
Is this normal (am I doing it
On 06/14/13 21:14, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and gtk_list_store_clear, and it didnt
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring the memory usage before and after execution of
g_object_unref and
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:33 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was monitoring
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:03:55 +0530
dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM, dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I was
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 00:17 -0700, Andrew Potter wrote:
I suspect something weird is happening because you have the wrong
function signature. I can't find any reference to the basic widget
methods on the python gtk documentation website, but the C signature
is:
void
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 10:22 +0100, jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
From a quick look your code ought to work. I've written stuff very
like this which works fine.
Hey John. Yeah, I'm stumped too.
I think you'll need to make a complete example I can try running,
sorry.
Coming up with a minimal for
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
I have three concerns. The first is that sometimes the incoming
allocation has some very strange width and height values in it, but are
usually valid the rest of the time. Sometimes I see values like
width of -408563232 and
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 18:17 -0700, Andrew Potter wrote:
That's unusual. Quick testing of my own image resizing does not seem
to have that occur. If you're sure that your requests are always
absolutely sane, you might want to put together a small test case as
it could indicate a pygtk bug, or
On 06/14/13 23:14, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:33 AM, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 22:09, Chris Vine wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:41:05 +0530
dEde.tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/14/13 17:02, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:27 AM,
22 matches
Mail list logo
