Re : GtkTreeView sorting triggered by cell renderer while, retaining row selection

2010-01-04 Thread Nicolas SOUBEIRAN
I've already signaling the issue between selection and toggle cell : here is the answer by kris If the column is sorted, when one activates the toggle, the tree is re-sorted (normal) but the selected row is changed (unexpected). I investigated and I found that when clicking on a toggle cell

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Bill C
2010/1/1 Erik de Castro Lopo mle+...@mega-nerd.com: - How does one go about teasing out the difference between my memory leaks and GTK stuff I have no control over? Just a few thoughts Valgrind is an excellent product, and is designed for programmer use only. It shows where

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 4:20 AM, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/1/1 Erik de Castro Lopo mle+...@mega-nerd.com:  - How does one go about teasing out the difference between my memory   leaks and GTK stuff I have no control over? I usually run my app twice: once with just startup/shutdown and

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Bill C wrote: Valgrind is an excellent product, and is designed for programmer use only. It shows where unreleased memory was allocated, so one can trace each chunk of memory to see if it should have been released, and take appropriate action it your code allocated it. That is easy when

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Dan Kegel
Erik de Castro Lopo mle+...@mega-nerd.com wrote:  ==12528== 27,300 bytes in 175 blocks are still reachable in loss record 11,194 of 11,196  ==12528==    at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)  ==12528==    by 0x4B342E3: g_malloc (gmem.c:131)  ==12528==    by 0x4B4A418: g_slice_alloc

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Dan Kegel wrote: Erik de Castro Lopo mle+...@mega-nerd.com wrote:  ==12528== 27,300 bytes in 175 blocks are still reachable in loss record 11,194 of 11,196  ==12528==    at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)  ==12528==    by 0x4B342E3: g_malloc (gmem.c:131)  ==12528==    by

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread David Nečas
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:39:48AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: ==12528== 27,300 bytes in 175 blocks are still reachable in loss record 11,194 of 11,196 ==12528==at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195) ==12528==by 0x4B342E3: g_malloc (gmem.c:131) ==12528==by

Re: Valgrind and GTK libraries

2010-01-04 Thread David Nečas
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:56:44PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: Erik de Castro Lopo mle+...@mega-nerd.com wrote:  ==12528== 27,300 bytes in 175 blocks are still reachable in loss record 11,194 of 11,196  ==12528==    at 0x4024C1C: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)  ==12528==    by 0x4B342E3: