Right now, GTK 3 is a moving target and developing for it is
likely to be quite frustrating. So I second the when it is
stable point.
And of course, in case you choose GTK+ because of the cross-platform
support, there is also the whenever it eventually maybe works
reliably on Windows point.
On Don 28.10.2010 09:24, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Right now, GTK 3 is a moving target and developing for it is likely
to be quite frustrating. So I second the when it is stable point.
And of course, in case you choose GTK+ because of the cross-platform
support, there is also the whenever it
Sorry but this point is not clear enough to me.
Do you mean that GTK+ is not stable enough on Windows (XP,Vista,7)?!
Well, that depends on your definition of stable. It depends much on
what the GTK+-using program wants to do, and whether continuous
building and testing of the program has been
It's impressive to see someone promoting tech from the other camp :-)
Why not? It isn't like it would have any impact on my personal
happiness/income/status/reputation if people use Qt and not GTK+ for
cross-platform apps. Also, I am not employed by anybody to work on
GTK+ so I don't see saying
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:25, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
It's impressive to see someone promoting tech from the other camp :-)
Why not? It isn't like it would have any impact on my personal
happiness/income/status/reputation if people use Qt and not GTK+ for
cross-platform apps. Also,
On Don 28.10.2010 11:35, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Sorry but this point is not clear enough to me.
Do you mean that GTK+ is not stable enough on Windows (XP,Vista,7)?!
[snipp]
And yes, I do say all this even if I am by many seen as the maintainer
of GTK+ on Windows. As the saying goes, patches
Around about 28/10/10 09:35, Tor Lillqvist typed ...
GTK+ 2 is to some extent usable on Windows, sure. Unfortunately, for
some aspects, earlier versions (up to 2.16 or so) are better than the
later ones up to the current stable version (2.22).
So what are the curent issues with the Win32
Around about 28/10/10 12:48, John Emmas typed ...
If I'm honest Neil, GTK2 does take a lot of getting used to if
you've come from an MFC background - but once you've gotten your head
around GTK, it really works very well indeed.
I guess it would; I've used GTK far more, on and off since
On 28 Oct 2010, at 13:35, Neil Bird wrote:
So the choice is yours - ease of compilation or ease of debugging.
Debugging, every time!
Same here! For me, debugging is the most enjoyable part of my development
cycle - but only if I have a decent debugger to help me.
Hello. I'm looking for GTK+ developers, who're interested in development
of
GTK+ based MPlayer frontend. I've started to write such frontend just
about
a year ago, now it's hosted on sf.net:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nmpfront/ . But unfortunately I have not
enough free time to keep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2010 10:58 AM, Alex Ermakov wrote:
Hello. I'm looking for GTK+ developers, who're interested in development
of
GTK+ based MPlayer frontend. I've started to write such frontend just
about
a year ago, now it's hosted on sf.net:
11 matches
Mail list logo