On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
Okay, I'm out of ideas...
I'm writing an app, that among a lot of other stuff, has three mutually
interacting spinbuttuns, i.e., if I increment spinbutton A, its callback
then updates values in B and C. B and then
En date de : Mer 5.3.14, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com a écrit :
The very easiest solution for my users would be for me to
distribute a .ZIP file of eighteen DLLs, which my app can fetch and
deploy. But that would require me to make the source of those DLLs
available, and AFAICT pointing
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Lucas Levrel llev...@yahoo.fr wrote:
En date de : Mer 5.3.14, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com a écrit :
The very easiest solution for my users would be for me to
distribute a .ZIP file of eighteen DLLs, which my app can fetch and
deploy. But that would require
Dne 05.03.2014 (sre) ob 18:38 +1100 je Chris Angelico napisal(a):
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
tris...@upstairslabs.com wrote:
Interesting, if I were you I would try to share the same adjustment
between all of your views.
I.e. I would keep the adjustment in the
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even
without no blocking of any kind. So, if this is a bug at all, I suppose
it could be
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm using
gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks out and make
them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even without no
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level, functions, and it all works even
Le 05/03/2014 18:07, Chris Vine a écrit :
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal,
On 03/05/14 12:07, Chris Vine wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation: I'm
using gcc and my callbacks were nested functions. Pull the callbacks
out and make them normal, top-level,
Le 05/03/2014 19:43, Chris Moller a écrit :
[...]
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to
use them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the
enclosing function, thereby minimising the amount of information you
have to pass. This is especially
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to use
them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the enclosing
function, thereby minimising the amount of information you have to pass.
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:43:29 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
On 03/05/14 12:07, Chris Vine wrote:
On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:44:48 -0500
Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
I was actually writing that testcase when I found a correlation:
I'm using gcc and my callbacks
On 03/05/14 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
gcc supports nested functions as an extension to standard C. I tend to use
them a lot because they operate within the stack frame of the enclosing
function, thereby minimising the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Chris Moller mol...@mollerware.com wrote:
On 03/05/14 13:52, Chris Angelico wrote:
Is there a reason you're trying to write high-level code in C?
Habit, mostly. I've been coding in C since the early 80s and I can do it in
my sleep. Python's okay, but I tend
14 matches
Mail list logo
