On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 02:43 +0100, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 24/03/2014 01:36, Joël Krähemann a écrit :
[...]
The following will compile but is it still correct?
g_atomic_pointer_set((returnable_thread-safe_data),
NULL);
Yes, as the atomic_int*
https://sourceforge.net/p/ags/code/1515/tree/src/ags/thread/ags_returnable_thread.c
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 00:20 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/p/ags/code/1515/tree/src/ags/thread/ags_returnable_thread.c
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 00:22 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 00:20 +0100, Joël Krähemann wrote:
https://sourceforge.net/p/ags/code/1515/tree/src/ags/thread/ags_returnable_thread.c
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
On 03/23/2014 08:36 PM, Joël Krähemann wrote:
The following will compile but is it still correct?
g_atomic_pointer_set((returnable_thread-safe_data),
NULL);
http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/glib/glib-Basic-Types.html#gpointer
typedef void* gpointer;
Le 24/03/2014 01:36, Joël Krähemann a écrit :
[...]
The following will compile but is it still correct?
g_atomic_pointer_set((returnable_thread-safe_data),
NULL);
Yes, as the atomic_int* functions expect a pointer to the integer to
atomically set, the
Le 24/03/2014 02:11, David Marceau a écrit :
On 03/23/2014 08:36 PM, Joël Krähemann wrote:
The following will compile but is it still correct?
g_atomic_pointer_set((returnable_thread-safe_data),
NULL);