> 20 years ago, everyone was hand-coding assembly routines.
We were? I think you are generalising slightly. 20 years ago, I would
assume most programmers were happily writing Cobol, Fortran, Pascal,
C, etc high-level languages.
("high-level" compared to machine language, that is. Of course, in th
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:05:28 +0100
Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glade has been doing this for years. It is much quicker for an
> application developer to use Glade to define menus, windows, dialogs,
> etc than it is to code then *statically*. I say statically because you
> don't nee
Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this does cross gtk-devel and
> gtk-app-devel: it's the thoughts of a common-or-garden app
> developer following the dicussions on gtk-devel about what's
> coming with GTK 3.0.
>
> As a starting point, on June 5, in the thread "Steps
Sorry for cross-posting, but I think this does cross gtk-devel and
gtk-app-devel: it's the thoughts of a common-or-garden app
developer following the dicussions on gtk-devel about what's
coming with GTK 3.0.
As a starting point, on June 5, in the thread "Steps to get to
GTK+ 3.0", Martyn Russe
