On Saturday, 04 August, 2012 09:07 PM, Robin Vossen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have figured out I require 2.4.0 of libatk (by reading headers).
> Who can give me libatk 2.4.0 prebuild for Windows (x86)?
>
> Thanks
>
>
You may use compiled binaries from
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=win
On 08/06/2012 12:59 PM, Gabriele Greco wrote:
I have wondered why we use dlls on windows, we should link statically to
the libraries.
I think the main reason is to make easier for app developer to be LGPL
compliant.
Also, GtkBuilder does not work statically linked on windows. It
requires the
On 6 August 2012 16:38, Robin Vossen wrote:
> It has libatk 1.32.
>
> I am going to downgrade to gtk+ 2.0 to resolve this issue.
> Looks like gtk+ 3.0 isn't stable on Windows yet.
>
> Thanks all.
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Robin Vossen
>
> Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachment
> I have wondered why we use dlls on windows, we should link statically to
> the libraries.
>
I think the main reason is to make easier for app developer to be LGPL
compliant.
--
Ing. Gabriele Greco, DARTS Engineering
Tel: +39-0100980150 Fax: +39-0100980184
s-mail: Piazza Della Vittoria 9/3 - 1
so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gtk-app-devel-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: DLL Hell on Windows.. (Robin Vossen)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
&
Hello,
I have figured out I require 2.4.0 of libatk (by reading headers).
Who can give me libatk 2.4.0 prebuild for Windows (x86)?
Thanks
--
Kind Regards,
Robin Vossen
Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
On
Thanks, but I forgot to add.
I am using GTK3 for this. I downloaded the (gtk3)bundle.
Also I've included the libatk that was shipped with it. But it didn't
seem to work.
--
Kind Regards,
Robin Vossen
Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See
http://www.gnu.org/philosoph
