On 2011-12-06, at 8:12 PM, Andrew Cowie and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
gtk_widget_set_size_request() should still succeed with the expected
behaviour
of setting the minimum size of a widget,
So, does it do so for
Hi,
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to
bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather serious
bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043) a month and a
half ago, and there is still no comment from any GTK developer. The bug
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
Hi Tristan,
This makes a bit more sense now.
On 12/05/2011 09:27 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgrenjohn.lindg...@aol.com
wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
gtk_widget_set_size_request() should still succeed with the expected behaviour
of setting the minimum size of a widget,
So, does it do so for GtkLabel? ie, is it acceptable to call it?
[this thread has become a bit confusing]
AfC
On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkomt...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi John,
I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
And I'm also surprised that this code is not working for you.
The last time I looked at size negotiation, the
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request()
when reporting its natural size:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043
2. Nor does it take into account gtk_label_set_width_chars():
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:56 PM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
On 12/05/2011 02:22 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkomt...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi John,
I am responsible for a large part of your pain.
And I'm also surprised that
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account gtk_widget_set_size_request() when
reporting its natural size:
Hi Tristan,
This makes a bit more sense now.
On 12/05/2011 09:27 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, John Lindgrenjohn.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
It looks to me as though there are 3 separate problems contributing here:
1. GtkLabel does not take into account
I don't really understand what max-width-chars would be useful for.
Can't you set a natural size for a widget instead of a natural max
char width? If I want to ellipsize it won't do me any good if
... is the same as
I can see there is gtk_set_size_request for setting minimum width,
hi;
On 4 December 2011 02:41, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to bugs
reported by application developers.
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on time.
hi;
On 4 December 2011 02:56, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
I agree that yours, and a few other GTK3 bugs[1][2], have kept me from
porting my apps from GTK2. My suggestion would be to post your e-mail to the
gtk-devel list[3], and as a last resort open a bug on the Red Hat
On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on time.
So the status at this moment is that no developers have time to look at
bugs reported by application developers. Or is there something wrong
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:21 AM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on time.
So the status at this moment is that no developers have time to
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Tristan Van Berkom t...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:21 AM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.com wrote:
On 12/04/2011 04:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
the status is always the same: bugs reported will be looked at by the
gtk maintainers depending on
Hi,
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to
bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather serious
bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043) a month and a
half ago, and there is still no comment from any GTK developer. The bug
On 12/03/2011 08:41 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard to
bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather serious
bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043) a month and a
half ago, and there is still no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2011 07:41 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering what the status of GTK 3 is at this time with regard
to bugs reported by application developers. I reported a rather
serious bug (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662043)
18 matches
Mail list logo
