Billy,
Yes, It's fine to me.
This can be one of my candidates of this solution.
By the way, do you have any idea of the situation
your mention Might work depending on the situation.
If you have, please please give me what you have.
Your answer would be greatly appreciated.
And...
Do you know
hey michael,
you really need to check your subscription information,
this one didn't get through either, so i'm forwarding.
---
ciaoTJ
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:21:07 +
From: michael meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL
On 12/21/05, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
One issue with this change is that current xgettext releases probably
won't extract strings for the Q2_() form.
Ah, you are right. We would have to do some extrs step, like extractig
the Q2 calls and convert them to Q in an auxiliary
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 12/21/05, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
One issue with this change is that current xgettext releases probably
won't extract strings for the Q2_() form.
Ah, you are right. We would have to do some extrs step, like extractig
the Q2 calls and convert them
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 12/21/05, James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
One issue with this change is that current xgettext releases probably
won't extract strings for the Q2_() form.
Ah, you are right. We would have to do some extrs step, like extractig
the
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 11:02 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
One issue with this change is that current xgettext releases probably
won't extract strings for the Q2_() form.
How does that work? Does it grep for
start of symbol
optional single letter
underscore
as a result of the recent GTK_FLOATING broken in 2.9? discussion:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2005-December/msg00107.html
as well as the ABI and API for g_object_ref_sink() discussion:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2005-December/msg00174.html
i've now
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, michael meeks wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:21:07 +
From: michael meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Janik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gtk Hackers gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: missing
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:49 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
GUnowned derives from GObject, has intiially a floating ref_count.
I hate to quibble names, but it seems really strange to have a
class GUnowned where instances are normally owned. (In fact, the
goal of anybody using a GUnowned has to be to
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:20 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 16:57 +, michael meeks wrote:
So - I've been trying to use the GMainContext to fix a rather tricky
issue in using unsafe single-threaded code accessed via ORBit2 from
multiple OO.o threads in a safe
Tim Janik wrote:
in fact, there is no technical reason for this. so many people have
argued this to be better though (havoc even went so far as to argue
why this would be conceptually neccessary), that i decided to simply
sponsor an object type if that helps the majority to understand which
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Yevgen Muntyan wrote:
Tim Janik wrote:
in fact, there is no technical reason for this. so many people have
argued this to be better though (havoc even went so far as to argue
why this would be conceptually neccessary), that i decided to simply
sponsor an object type if
12 matches
Mail list logo
