Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-10 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2007/10/10, Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Am Mittwoch, den 10.10.2007, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz: > > The light in the middle of the cube (in the center corner) doesn't > > help to make contrast with the white letters. > > Tango suggests to use the upper left corner as a light

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-10 Thread Mathias Hasselmann
Am Mittwoch, den 10.10.2007, 18:11 -0400 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Message body is too big: 173477 bytes with a limit of 100 KB So I'll resend: > Am Mittwoch, den 10.10.2007, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz: > > The light in the middle of the cube (in the center corner) doesn't > > help to ma

Re: GdkPixbuf vs. Cairo, new image library needed?

2007-10-10 Thread Soeren Sandmann
"BJörn Lindqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Incidentally, blitting pixbufs is slower than it has to be because its > format rarely matches the X11 server which uses either xRGB32 or > ARGB32. I don't disagree with anything else you say, but this "performance issue" is really a non-issue. We a

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-10 Thread Cody Russell
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 09:25 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: > Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Kristian Rietveld: > >> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > >>> Have anyone seen this[0] one? I think it's a great improvement > over

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-10 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2007/10/10, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Kristian Rietveld: > >> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > >>> Have anyone seen this[0] one? I think it's a great improvement over > the > >>

Re: GTK+ Website Review

2007-10-10 Thread Martyn Russell
Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:40 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: [snip] >>> Under Language Bindings on the same page, i believe that >>> gtk2-perl has had full support for 2.0 and 2.2 for quite some >>> time now. > [snip] > > As the original page says, these have always been self-r

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-10 Thread Martyn Russell
Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > Am Montag, den 08.10.2007, 11:36 +0200 schrieb Kristian Rietveld: >> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 04:22:09PM +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote: >>> Have anyone seen this[0] one? I think it's a great improvement over the >>> original one. And as Xan said, we avoid the >>> aqua-and-rou