Le samedi 15 mars 2008 à 21:43 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit :
Hi Jean;
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
libraries?
This might indeed pose a problem, though I'm not sure how major it
I think that they're ready to go. Outside of the GTK+ tree, they won't
get much testing.
Do you think they cam unconditionally replace the traditional
loaders that depend on external libraries for Win32, or should we add
some --disable-gdiplus-loaders switch to the configury?
--tml
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:48 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:48 +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
Our headers currently state:
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free
Hi Tor,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that they're ready to go. Outside of the GTK+ tree, they won't
get much testing.
Do you think they cam unconditionally replace the traditional
loaders that depend on external libraries for Win32,
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Jaap A. Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can one of the maintainers decide what to do with the patch attached at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514396
Can I commit?
Should I remove gtk_show_help?
I removed gtk_show_help and attached the
Buenos dias,
Tim Janik wrote:
Hello Gtk+ Crowd.
...
Further comments are of course welcome, we intend to keep the
document updated as new issues are raised/solved.
The proposed plan to migrate to Gtk+ 3.0 is going to remove public struct
fields and introduce new accessors for these
Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2008, 07:49 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Le samedi 15 mars 2008 à 21:43 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit :
Hi Jean;
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
libraries?
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:48 +0100 schrieb Tim Janik:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html
In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be,
Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2008, 11:22 -0400 schrieb Dominic Lachowicz:
Hi Tor,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that they're ready to go. Outside of the GTK+ tree, they won't
get much testing.
Do you think they cam unconditionally
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2008, 07:49 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Le samedi 15 mars 2008 à 21:43 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit :
Hi Jean;
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:43 +0100, Christian Persch wrote:
Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:09 +0100 schrieb Jean Bréfort:
Hmm, and what will happen to applications using at least one GPLv2-only
libraries?
This might indeed pose a problem, though I'm not sure how major it is. I
have to
hi
i asked the question in gtk +general but no response so i am asking it here
i have a question regarding visibility-notify-event
If i add widgets to a container than i get the signal
visibility-notify-event, whenever visibility changes
but if i add widgets to a scrolledwindow i donot
13 matches
Mail list logo
