On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> So can they actully be flipped at runtime now? The documentation seems
> to suggest that they can't if they still use the old common base
> classes.
The intention is to eventually make GtkScale and friends
instantiatable. When that happe
[...]
>> > > > > If the base classes can now already do everything then shouldn't the
>> > > > > V/H
>> > > > > classes be deprecated already?
Gtk[VH]Foo deprecation++ from me, yes it should be deprecated if it doesnt
serve a purpose - hardcoding the orientation IMO does not serve a
purpose at al
Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 21:36 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:04 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 1
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 21:36 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:04 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +
Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:04 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> > > > AFAIR, you can flip it of you crea
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> > > AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you
> > > create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}..
Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> > AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you
> > create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}... Mitch?
>
> Ah. Were those base classes (GtkBox, etc) instantiable
Christian Dywan a écrit :
> This is how the current state is to my awareness:
>
> It is meant to work so that subclasses such a GtkHFoo and GtkVFoo
> behave the same as they used to, and can't flip. However if you use the
> originally abstract base class 'orientation' works as expected, at
> constr
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you
> create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}... Mitch?
Ah. Were those base classes (GtkBox, etc) instantiable before?
If the base classes can now already do everything then shouldn't
Am Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:07:34 +0100
schrieb Murray Cumming :
> The new GtkOrientable's documentation
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Orientable.html#gtk-Orientable.description
> says:
> "Historically, such widgets have been realized as subclasses of a
> common base class (e.g GtkB
Hi!
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:51:10 +0100
Sven Herzberg wrote:
> AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you
> create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}... Mitch?
Gtk[HV]Box sets only the property in init. So it should be possible to change
the orientation.
In the set_property funct
Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> The new GtkOrientable's documentation
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Orientable.html#gtk-Orientable.description
> says:
> "Historically, such widgets have been realized as subclasses of a common
> base class (e.g G
The new GtkOrientable's documentation
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Orientable.html#gtk-Orientable.description
says:
"Historically, such widgets have been realized as subclasses of a common
base class (e.g GtkBox/GtkHBox/GtkVBox and
GtkScale/GtkHScale/GtkVScale). GtkOrientable is
13 matches
Mail list logo
