Can anyone help with some tips on constructing XEvents to signal a mouse
double-click? Down-Up-Down-Up (4 XEvents) without a MouseMove?
TIA,
Chuck Crisler
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Hello All.
I'm quite new to C, but have done some gtk programming in perl.
I've been looking for answers on the web, and in various tutorials, without
any luck.
My question is how to pass more widgets as a gpointer, to a callback
function. (in C )
For instance if a OK button, has to read the
Hello.
The common solution to this problem is to create a structure
containing all of the widgets you may need in callbacks and than pass
pointer to it around.
Some sample code can be found here:
http://gtkforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=2913#8098
Hope this helps a bit.
Bye
2009/4/20 Jens Hansen
Hello, Jens
The other way is to make your widgets global. Especially, me? I use
GOjects, and always pass self object. For example, I inherit main
window object from GtkWindow and later in widgets definition pass
itself to callback. Also, you can use g_object_set_data for storing
some useful
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:19 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Regarding your other comments, I largely agree with them and this mail
would be too long if I replied to all of them.
So, to sum up, the main suggestions you are making are
- Rework low-level bits of EggDBus so it's like
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 20:05 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
I've recently been trying to purge my GTK app of deprecated
stuff, and I tried replacing gnome_url_show() with
gtk_show_uri(). No go; on invoking gtk_show_uri() I get
operation not
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, David Zeuthen wrote:
I could be wrong, but just briefly looking at the code it looks like
there is no default implementation of GDesktopAppInfoLookup in GIO,
there's only one in GVfs (that looks up stuff in
Am Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:00:41 +0200
schrieb Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, David Zeuthen wrote:
I could be wrong, but just briefly looking at the code it looks
like there is no default implementation of
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:31 +0200, Christian Dywan wrote:
What about using xdg-open if GVfs is not available OR if gconf is
not available? That's a tiny script that can be easily installed
anywhere, even on less modern boxes.
That would give you a nice circular dependency if xdg-open(1) is
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:45 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
That would give you a nice circular dependency if xdg-open(1) is ever
ported to use GIO [1] which is not at all unlikely...
David
[1] : under GNOME, xdg-open(1) uses gnome-open(1) which AFAICT uses
gnome-vfs2...
gnome-open
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
As it's currently coded gtk_show_uri is bound
to fail if GVfs is not present. But more than that: it'll fail
even if GVfs
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
As it's currently coded gtk_show_uri is bound
to fail if GVfs is not
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:36 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
As it's
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
00, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:43 -0400, Allin Cottrell
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Alexander Larsson wrote:
gvfs needs a session bus, not a system bus, so you're falling back to a
non-gvfs system. Thus no http support.
OK, I suppose I can get this working on my own system, but my main
point is: why does GTK include a function such as gtk_show_uri
which
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Havoc Pennington wrote:
I think my arguments are compelling. If someone else thinks
differently, they can say so, and explain their reasoning...
The bottom line is that dbus has an MIT/X11-equivalent license, with
the addition of a *weaker* patent clause than LGPL/GPL
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Allin Cottrell cottr...@wfu.edu wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Havoc Pennington wrote:
The license was written by a lawyer and is perfectly sane.
Sane and written by a lawyer are surely orthogonal to
desirability from the point of view of free software.
17 matches
Mail list logo
