Re: Shrinking and growing widgets in GTK+ 3.x

2010-12-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 11:51 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote: > Hi, > > It seems like the following would work but maybe I'm missing the obvious > > * have the video request natural size = its natural unscaled size, and > min size of whatever lowest scale factor you want to allow > > * to snap to n

More GTK breakage

2010-12-02 Thread Benjamin Otte
Hey everyone, If you read this mail, it's probably because GTK made your compile fail. Again. It might be because the final part of the GTK3 rendering cleanup has landed. This part only touches GDK APIs, so most applications should not be affected at all. If your app has been affected nonetheles

Re: IPv6 Link local addresses not supported.

2010-12-02 Thread Dan Winship
On 11/30/2010 12:12 PM, Achuta wrote: > Hi, > > GLib/GIO cannot listen on IPv6 link local address. This bug is because > GSocketAddress does not have a field for "sin6_scope_id" to fill in > interface > index (as stated in `man 7 ipv6`). > > I would like to make the changes. Is there some manual/

Re: Shrinking and growing widgets in GTK+ 3.x

2010-12-02 Thread Owen Taylor
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:56 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Heya, > > One of the features of Totem (and one implemented in a number of movie > players) is to resize the video to match the actual video size (or a > multiple of it). For example, a 320x480 video would see Totem resize its > video canv

Re: Shrinking and growing widgets in GTK+ 3.x

2010-12-02 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, It seems like the following would work but maybe I'm missing the obvious * have the video request natural size = its natural unscaled size, and min size of whatever lowest scale factor you want to allow * to snap to natural size, just size request the entire toplevel to get the natural size,

Re: Shrinking and growing widgets in GTK+ 3.x

2010-12-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:07 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 00:56 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Heya, > If you want the whole window to "shrink", a.) that's a little > yuck, I'm not sure how much end-users like that behaviour ... > b.) GTK+ doesnt like doing that... but