Re: GtkBuilder syntax for property bindings

2011-05-06 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:42 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote: > > Since GBinding, is itself, an object, why not just have the GBinding > > instance represented in the GtkBuilder XML. The normal object syntax > > might work as well: > > > >

Re: GtkBuilder syntax for property bindings

2011-05-06 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:42 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote: > Since GBinding, is itself, an object, why not just have the GBinding > instance represented in the GtkBuilder XML. The normal object syntax > might work as well: > > > object1 > object2 > > > I think this would mean the

Re: GLib: libffi dependency

2011-05-06 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2011/5/6 David Zeuthen : > Hi, > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: >> Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi >> or --enable-gdbus-codegen > > No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added > g_cclosure_marshal_generic() function will

Re: GtkBuilder syntax for property bindings

2011-05-06 Thread Christian Hergert
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:04 +0200, Denis Washington wrote: > The main issue with this approach is what to do with two-way bindings. > One approach would be to make this a property of , but then, > wouldn't appear in every property it influences anymore. > Alternatively, the parser could be requ

Re: GLib: libffi dependency

2011-05-06 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
/me hugs davidz. :-) seriously, thanks for plugging this gaping hole in Glib. It's been far too long. Ciao, Emmanuele. On 6 May 2011 16:02, "David Zeuthen" wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > Is it possible to m... No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the

Re: GLib: libffi dependency

2011-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:02 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > > Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi > > or --enable-gdbus-codegen > > No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added > g_cclos

Re: GLib: libffi dependency

2011-05-06 Thread David Zeuthen
Hi, On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi > or --enable-gdbus-codegen No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added g_cclosure_marshal_generic() function will not work without libffi. I think a b

GLib: libffi dependency

2011-05-06 Thread Maarten Bosmans
The libffi dependency was added in this commit: http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=9c8341f1aaf01148ee2ca7f634478cdfaf4a0303 in order to support the gio/gdbus-codegen python script. Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi or --enable-gdbus-codegen Maarten __

dconf 0.7.4

2011-05-06 Thread Ryan Lortie
hi everyone I just released dconf 0.7.4 with two long-awaited feature improvements. First, the commandline tool no longer sucks. Second, we have system lockdown support via editing text files and dconf update (which apparently is how most people want to do it anyway). I'll update the wiki with

GtkBuilder syntax for property bindings

2011-05-06 Thread Denis Washington
Hello, My name is Denis Washington, and I was selected as a Google Summer of Code student this year (yay!). My project is to add support for GObject property binding (a.k.a. GBinding [1]) to Glade; see [2] for my complete proposal. A core component of this work is a new bit of GtkBuilder fil

Re: reftests

2011-05-06 Thread Kristian Rietveld
On May 5, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Otte wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: >> As we've already discussed on IRC some time ago, I would really like to see >> all >> GTK+ unit tests in one single place, instead of in several different places >> in the >> source co