On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 18:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:42 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> > Since GBinding, is itself, an object, why not just have the GBinding
> > instance represented in the GtkBuilder XML. The normal object syntax
> > might work as well:
> >
> >
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 12:42 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> Since GBinding, is itself, an object, why not just have the GBinding
> instance represented in the GtkBuilder XML. The normal object syntax
> might work as well:
>
>
> object1
> object2
>
>
> I think this would mean the
2011/5/6 David Zeuthen :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
>> Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi
>> or --enable-gdbus-codegen
>
> No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added
> g_cclosure_marshal_generic() function will
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:04 +0200, Denis Washington wrote:
> The main issue with this approach is what to do with two-way bindings.
> One approach would be to make this a property of , but then,
> wouldn't appear in every property it influences anymore.
> Alternatively, the parser could be requ
/me hugs davidz. :-)
seriously, thanks for plugging this gaping hole in Glib. It's been far too
long.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On 6 May 2011 16:02, "David Zeuthen" wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans
wrote:
> Is it possible to m...
No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:02 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
> > Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi
> > or --enable-gdbus-codegen
>
> No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added
> g_cclos
Hi,
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
> Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi
> or --enable-gdbus-codegen
No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly added
g_cclosure_marshal_generic() function will not work without libffi. I
think a b
The libffi dependency was added in this commit:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=9c8341f1aaf01148ee2ca7f634478cdfaf4a0303
in order to support the gio/gdbus-codegen python script.
Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi
or --enable-gdbus-codegen
Maarten
__
hi everyone
I just released dconf 0.7.4 with two long-awaited feature improvements.
First, the commandline tool no longer sucks.
Second, we have system lockdown support via editing text files and dconf
update (which apparently is how most people want to do it anyway). I'll
update the wiki with
Hello,
My name is Denis Washington, and I was selected as a Google Summer of
Code student this year (yay!). My project is to add support for GObject
property binding (a.k.a. GBinding [1]) to Glade; see [2] for my complete
proposal.
A core component of this work is a new bit of GtkBuilder fil
On May 5, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
>> As we've already discussed on IRC some time ago, I would really like to see
>> all
>> GTK+ unit tests in one single place, instead of in several different places
>> in the
>> source co
11 matches
Mail list logo