On 11/23/2011 07:28 AM, KC wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 11/22/2011 10:13 PM, KC wrote:
So the Unfortunately ... statement only apply to GDK on WIN32 ?
It's safe to call GTK+ APIs (if protected by gdk_threads_enter/leave)
from
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin
manutm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/23/2011 07:28 AM, KC wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com
wrote:
On 11/22/2011 10:13 PM, KC wrote:
So the Unfortunately ... statement only apply to GDK on WIN32 ?
- Windows portability for gnome software
(http://www.iki.fi/tml/fosdem-2006.pdf)
I don't know this useful presentation before, Thanks.
I have spent weeks trying to debug a gtk-win32 application with threads
until I finally discovered this one and modified the code. ;)
--
Emmanuel
Hi,
I'm facing the same problem, which version of glib are you using ? I'm using
the 2.28.8, and I'm working on embedded ARM device.
I tried to run the test gdbus-serialization, first on my computer (x86_64)
and there is no problem.
Then I run it on the target I'm working on (armv5tejl), and I
I've been updating the suppression file to work with the new version of Gtk.
I'm getting a few errors for widgets which are deleted by Gtk (using the manage
function), which look like this:
From: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org
I've been updating the suppression file to work with the new version of Gtk.
I'm getting a few errors for widgets which are deleted by Gtk (using the manage
function), which look like this (N.B. it's actually a Gtkmm app):
==13910== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5,230
sorry, mistake when copying and pasting, that should have been:
==3291== 20 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5,225 of 10,005
==3291==at 0x4028876: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==3291==by 0x4E0D80A: standard_malloc (gmem.c:88)
==3291==by 0x4E0DD61: g_malloc
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:07 +, Thomas Harty wrote:
I'll see if I can narrow down exactly what's causing this...
Still, looks like you're pretty close to a good suppression file.
Where should we install it?
/usr/share/suppression/glib.sup
/usr/share/suppression/gtk.sup
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:26 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
By the way, I also noticed that g_thread_init() is deprecated,
presumably because you must now used g_thread_new(), so you don't need
it, but I don't see a deprecation comment on g_thread_init().
There are still no deprecation
Hey Kris,
sorry for the late mail, I wanted to get to it earlier, but I forgot.
I blame Matthias wanting to get a release out. :)
In case you didn't notice, I did some refactoring in the treeview code
and pushed it to master. It's mainly meant for the accessibility
implementation. I'll continue
Hello Benjamin,
On Nov 24, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Benjamin Otte wrote:
In case you didn't notice, I did some refactoring in the treeview code
and pushed it to master. It's mainly meant for the accessibility
implementation. I'll continue doing that for a bit, until the treeview
a11y implementation
11 matches
Mail list logo
