Emmanuele Bassi gmail.com> writes:
> I guess we'll have to maintain the gdk_threads_set_lock_functions(),
> and internally use gdk_threads_enter()/_leave(), even if the API is
> not available in public headers.
>
No, we will not.
If you want to use GTK, you will have to ensure that all GTK func
Peter Hurley hurleysoftware.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a plan for implementing the CSS box model into existing
> containers?
>
Yes, the idea is to support the full CSS box model and only the CSS box model.
Widget style properties will go away. No idea how long that will take though.
Be
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Same question goes for RedHat, are they actually offering support to ISVs?
We support our products, of course, which do include various versions of GTK+.
But that is a bit different from the kind of support that this page
talks about...
I do wonder if Novell is actually offering Gtk+ support anymore, or whether
we should refer them as SuSE (in case they want and they do actually offer
such support?).
Same question goes for RedHat, are they actually offering support to ISVs?
2012/3/19 Matthias Clasen
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> If there are no major objections, I will push this by Friday this week or
> shortly after.
>
> Comments welcome,
It looks fine to me, thanks for doing this. Only question I have is
whether it is ok to list companies as 'providing gtk su
Excerpts from Martyn Russell's message of lun mar 19 16:12:32 +0100 2012:
> Hi all,
>
> For a while, I/we at Lanedo have thought that gtk.org is missing a
> commercial support page. Qt has one and it's even been requested by some
> clients in the past IIRC.
>
> I've been meaning to merge this b
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:13 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I'd like to get some more opinions on this from language binding
> > authors - will reverting this change cause more harm now, or is it the
> > right thing to do ?
That's a tough call...the commit is two months old, so it's quite
possib
Hi all,
For a while, I/we at Lanedo have thought that gtk.org is missing a
commercial support page. Qt has one and it's even been requested by some
clients in the past IIRC.
I've been meaning to merge this branch for a while:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk-web/log/?h=support
The result i
On 16/03/12 09:54, Mathieu Dupuy wrote:
Hello everyone.
According to the project page (http://www.dsource.org/projects/gtkd),
gtk D binding now wrap gtk 2.22. Please update langage bindings page,
which tells it only supports up to 2.18.
Hi,
Done.
Thanks for letting us know.
--
Regards,
Marty
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:40:51AM +1100, Danielle Madeley wrote:
> Are you missing gvfs ? It provides the extension point for most URI
> types.
Thanks for the reply.
I seemed to have figured it out. The problem was dbus. Since I use a
headless system without any DMs, the dbus session for the use
Hi there,
Trying to add tests to the gobject-introspection test suite to cover more
of the functions and learn about the code.
wanted to create a simple test to create an object from
the libgirepository_internals.a but having problems linking,
wondering if anyone can give me some advice on this ?
Hello everyone.
According to the project page (http://www.dsource.org/projects/gtkd),
gtk D binding now wrap gtk 2.22. Please update langage bindings page,
which tells it only supports up to 2.18.
Thank you.
--
Dupuy Mathieu
___
gtk-devel-list mailing l
Hi All,
When installing Glib 2.28.0 I am stuck at below.
Could you please help me to resolve this issue ?
> make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/misc3ppi386/glib/src/glib-2.28.0'
Making all in .
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/misc3ppi386/glib/src/glib-2.28.0'
make[2]: Le
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:07 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 5 March 2012 13:07, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> > The removal will come in GTK4. There will be no replacement
> > functionality -- you will just be expected to do all your interaction
> > with the toolkit from the main thread (ie: dispatchi
Hi guys,
Just a quick sanity check, I noted Ryan's blog mentioned:
"we’re going to deprecate gdk threads next cycle. (yay!)"
Does that mean you're removing gdk_threads_enter and leave and the
semantics around that ? is there some cunning new scheme proposed to
intercept t
Hi all,
I am facing one issue while converting a character set into UTF-8 format.
I am using the glib function "g_convert()" for converting the character set
to UTF-8.
The input string : ‹g-“-Ç
Its Hex values are : 8b 67 96 93 97 c7
When I used gcc version of libc - 2.12.90(Running on PC) - We go
Hello Guys,
I have found GTK bindings for the Go programming language. Maybe you
want add them to the list on the GTK website.
https://github.com/mattn/go-gtk
Best Regards
Andy
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 05:55 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> a while ago, we changed the annotations for gtk_menu_popup to skip
> that function and instead rename gtk_menu_popup_for_device to
> gtk_menu_popup. The reason for this change was that gtk_menu_popup
> doesn't have a destroy noti
Hey,
a while ago, we changed the annotations for gtk_menu_popup to skip
that function and instead rename gtk_menu_popup_for_device to
gtk_menu_popup. The reason for this change was that gtk_menu_popup
doesn't have a destroy notify for its user_data, which is problematic
for language bindings. Now,
19 matches
Mail list logo