On 08.02.2013 04:08, Simon Feltman wrote:
I've created a ticket and proposed patch for GTK+:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693393
I am looking for feedback to see if this type of thing is even
acceptable and if it's worthy of further pursuit.
Won't gobject-introspection silently
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Torsten Schoenfeld kaffeeti...@gmx.dewrote:
Won't gobject-introspection silently turn the (transfer full) annotation
into (transfer none) due to the special handling for GInitiallyUnonwed
descendants?
It seems to pick it up correctly. The problem was actually
I'm trying to port libview (http://view.sourceforge.net/) to Gtk+ 3.x, and
something that I've run into is that the way that view::FieldEntry sets
tabstops into the parent entry's PangoLayout causes the cursor position logic
inside GtkEntry to break quite a bit. The way it's solved today is to
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:06 PM, David Trowbridge dav...@vmware.com wrote:
I'm trying to port libview (http://view.sourceforge.net/) to Gtk+ 3.x, and
something that I've run into is that the way that view::FieldEntry sets
tabstops into the parent entry's PangoLayout causes the cursor position
Il Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:38:44 -0500 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
scrisse:
Would be nice to have such a validating entry subclass in GTK+ itself
too; if you are willing to consider a move from C++ to C.
I've a custom widget that performs regex validation providing
visual feedback
