Try this package:
$ pacman -Ss mingw-w64-i686-gtk3
mingw32/mingw-w64-i686-gtk3 3.18.6-1 [installed]
GObject-based multi-platform GUI toolkit (v3) (mingw-w64)
On 5/4/2016 3:51 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> Yeah, I see that, but that only downloads 64-bit binaries. I need the Win-32
>
Yeah, I see that, but that only downloads 64-bit binaries. I need the Win-32
binaries.
On 5/4/2016 at 12:20 PM, Florian Pelz wrote:
>On 05/04/2016 03:59 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
>> No, there are no Win32 binaries in MSYS2. Where are you getting your
>> information?
On 05/04/2016 03:59 PM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> No, there are no Win32 binaries in MSYS2. Where are you getting your
> information?
>
MSYS2 contains pacman. `pacman -Syu mingw-w64-x86_64-gtk3` downloads
GTK+ binaries for x86_64 and puts them in the C:\msys64\mingw64
directory (by default). This
On 04/05/2016 16:54, fanc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
Hi John,
The patch went upstream, so you should be able to build normally after
you sync.
With blessings!
Yes, that's all building again now. Thanks.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
Hi John,
The patch went upstream, so you should be able to build normally after
you sync.
With blessings!
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On 04/05/2016 16:05, fanc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
Hi John/LRN,
I opened a bug to fix the issue:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765991
That's great news. Thanks.
John
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi John/LRN,
I opened a bug to fix the issue:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765991
With blessings, and cheers!
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
No, there are no Win32 binaries in MSYS2. Where are you getting your
information?
On 5/4/2016 at 12:29 AM, Florian Pelz wrote:
>On 05/04/2016 02:22 AM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
>> I have an idea! Why doesn't someone just compile all the binaries for Win32
>> and Win64
On 5/3/2016 at 5:42 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>On Tue, 3 May 2016, Andrew Robinson wrote:
>
>> I have never seen a cross-compiled version of Fedora. Is it related to the
>> mythical Chimera?
>
>Read for comprehension. Fedora is strictly Linux (of course), but
>offers a set of
On 04.05.2016 13:25, Fan, Chun-wei wrote:
> On 2016年5月2日 下午08:22, LRN wrote:
>> On 02.05.2016 14:36, John Emmas wrote:
>>> I just hit a problem when building from git master with MSVC (32-bit
>>> build).
>>>
>>> 'S_ISDIR' is coming up as an unknown symbol.
>>
>> fanc, care to comment?
>
> To
Hi,
To fix this, we could just use g_file_test (fullname, G_FILE_TEST_IS_DIR) in
place of the whole check that is there.
With blessings, and cheers!
從 Windows 10 手機傳送
寄件者: LRN
傳送時間: 2016年5月2日 下午 08:22
收件者: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
副本: Fan, Chun-wei (范君維)
主旨: Re: Unknown symbol in
Hi;
On 4 May 2016 at 05:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> This is why I would like to propose two patches, one against GTK+ 2.x
>> and the other against GTK+ 3.x, introducing the environment variables
>> GTK2_PATH and
On 05/04/2016 02:22 AM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> I have an idea! Why doesn't someone just compile all the binaries for Win32
> and Win64 and make them available on the Internet, that way none of us will
> have to go through all this stupid BS just to get some binaries? Just two
> packages, one for
13 matches
Mail list logo