GTK-Next (was: Re: Gtk+4.0)

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:08 AM Simon McVittie < simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/07/16 20:42, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > In fact, this could be a new plan. If we double down on Flatpak, then we > > could simply not bump soname / major version, leave it at 4, break ABI > > every

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:31 PM wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Here are some thoughts I have about all this, from a

Re: Gtk+4.0

I realized this thread had been sitting for quite a while. GUADEC is about to start and I'd like to summarize what's been talked about. Some of the concerns I read from this thread are: 1. Developers are concerned about there not being enough indication of which APIs are more likely or less