On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 14:27 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 06.09.2005 15:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Also gtkstatusicon-x11.c not only implements the fdo spec but it also
defines a bunch of status icon api. Not only 21 functions but
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 01:38 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk
internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is
considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but
On 19.09.2005 00:38, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but why the rush?
Isn't
On 06.09.2005 15:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Also gtkstatusicon-x11.c not only implements the fdo spec but it also
defines a bunch of status icon api. Not only 21 functions but additionally
quite some properties. Should all this be
On 18.09.2005 14:27, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Before diving too deep into the code of (now) gtkstatusicon.c I've tried
it on Linux - but it does not work there, too. What am I supposed to
update so see any effect of ./teststatusicon ? (I'm running gnome-2.10.2
on gentoo with xorg-x11-6.8.2)
Hans Breuer writes:
BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk internals
could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is considered
too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but why the rush?
Isn't it better to wait some time and let the X11
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 04.09.2005 22:59, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 15:27 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 30.08.2005 00:37, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
cvs as of today has
Trying to make it compile on win32 implies that two files
On 04.09.2005 22:59, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 15:27 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
On 30.08.2005 00:37, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[...]
cvs as of today has
Trying to make it compile on win32 implies that two files
should be renamed :
gtkstatusicon-x11.c has nothing X11
Matthias Clasen wrote:
...
5) There is an implied focus problem; does the bubble steal focus when
it demands attention? Almost certainly it shouldn't, but otherwise how
does the screenreader or magnifier user notice it? We may need some
kind of API for this - but the WM hints for urgency
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 11:37 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
I believe part of the reason for having the notification area pop up the
balloons was to give a consistent visual appearance for the balloons.
Isn't that generally addressed by having the widget in GTK+?
Note that for the suggested
Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 11:37 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
I believe part of the reason for having the notification area pop up the
balloons was to give a consistent visual appearance for the balloons.
Isn't that generally addressed by having the widget in GTK+?
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 00:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Anything we add in that area has to be examined for
cross-platformability. Does anybody have a pointer to the
MSDN docs about balloon messages on Win32 ?
A balloon message is
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 19:33 +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[snip]
* if the panel is not sticky, does the bubble go away if the user
switches to a desktop without the panel ?
+1 to it going away.
If anyone does not need a panel,
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 19:52 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 19:33 +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 12:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
[snip]
* if the panel is not sticky, does the bubble go away if the user
switches to a desktop without
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
No, gnome-panels are always sticky. Lets rephrase the problem in
more general terms:
What happens to the notification bubble if the system tray becomes
unviewable ?
Hmmm, so if a notification falls in the woods and no one is around
some thoughts about EggStatusIcon:
*the function prototypes should be made future save with transparency background
in mind (in the future the tray spec probably change from sending window IDs to
sending icons to make transparency possible).
*meanwhile transparency could be faked with copy the
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:37 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
some thoughts about EggStatusIcon:
*the function prototypes should be made future save with transparency
background
in mind (in the future the tray spec probably change from sending window IDs
to
sending icons to make
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- There are quite a few details which the implementation currently
doesn't handle currently:
* the bubble needs to be repositioned if the user changes panel
orientation
* the bubble stem needs to be redrawn if the tray icon moves
because another status
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 10:02 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- There are quite a few details which the implementation currently
doesn't handle currently:
* the bubble needs to be repositioned if the user changes panel
orientation
* the bubble stem needs
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 10:02 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
- There are quite a few details which the implementation currently
doesn't handle currently:
* the bubble needs to be repositioned if the user changes panel
orientation
*
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The requirement to have an API that can be implemented on all
platforms
supported by GTK+ rules out the EggTrayIcon API, since Win32 does not
allow to embed arbitrary
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 14:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The requirement to have an API that can be implemented on all
platforms
supported by GTK+ rules out the EggTrayIcon API, since Win32 does not
allow to embed arbitrary
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:34 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Did you see that EggTray already has API for sending notifications from
the tray icon to the tray, with gtk_status_icon_set_balloon_text() ?
Yeah...I just based it on EggTrayIcon because for historical reasons
Rhythmbox wasn't using
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 16:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Anything we add in that area has to be examined for
cross-platformability. Does anybody have a pointer to the
MSDN docs about balloon messages on Win32 ?
A balloon message is just a tooltip with a certain style on win32.
Tooltip
24 matches
Mail list logo
