On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:33 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Yeah, this doesn't look right. If the user is specified in the uri it
> > should be so in the sftp mountpoint too. I've fixed this on trunk, but
> > its a string addition, so its kinda hard to fix on stable...
> >
>
> An untranslated s
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 15:42 +0200, Markku Vire wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm wondering whether gvfs-fuse-daemon is expected to support multiple
>> mounts from the same server. I have the following kind of situation:
>>
>
Am Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:56:27 +0100
schrieb Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 15:42 +0200, Markku Vire wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I'm wondering whether gvfs-fuse-daemon is expected to support
> > multiple mounts from the same server. I have the following kind of
> > s
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 15:42 +0200, Markku Vire wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm wondering whether gvfs-fuse-daemon is expected to support multiple
> mounts from the same server. I have the following kind of situation:
>
> sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/some/path
> sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/some/path
>
> When
Hi list,
I'm wondering whether gvfs-fuse-daemon is expected to support multiple
mounts from the same server. I have the following kind of situation:
sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/some/path
sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/some/path
When I mount these shares, I end up having:
$HOME/.gvfs/sftp on server/
$HO
