Re: GL and libepoxy

2015-03-06 Thread John Ralls
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > Are you sure? This shouldn't be the case since > > https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e3051481cc9f5b7b36b317aff1454ee16ea9cdb9 > > > > On Fri

Re: GL and libepoxy

2015-03-06 Thread Philip Chimento
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > Are you sure? This shouldn't be the case since > > > https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e3051481cc9f5b7b36b317aff1454ee16ea9cdb9 > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:54 PM, John Ralls wrote: > >> It looks like we've committed to using lib

Re: GL and libepoxy

2015-03-06 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Are you sure? This shouldn't be the case since https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e3051481cc9f5b7b36b317aff1454ee16ea9cdb9 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:54 PM, John Ralls wrote: > It looks like we've committed to using libepoxy[1] as a shim for GL > support. It looks quite nice, but there's a

GL and libepoxy

2015-03-06 Thread John Ralls
It looks like we've committed to using libepoxy[1] as a shim for GL support. It looks quite nice, but there's a catch: In spite of the claim in our INSTALL that it's cross-platform, it actually depends on X11. I think that means that we need to have a separate GL interface per-backend. Regards